Well, the Turks are now bombing within the Iraqi border. Pelosi and Santos sparked this.
WHERE IS THE TRIAL!?!?
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Monday, October 22, 2007
Update on Treason Ignored
(Recommended to read post directly below first.)
PKK members are attacking Turkey. Reports are coming in that Turkish troops are already entering Northern Iraq in small numbers, which may or may not be true. Oil prices are at record highs because the PKK has threatened that it might target pipelines that go through Iraq and/or Turkey.
Now why would the PKK want to provoke Turkey now? My guess is that Iran is pulling their strings. I am just waiting for evidence to surface (look to talk radio, CNN won't cover this probably ever) that Iranian weapons, maybe intelligence, is being supplied to the PKK. Why? Simple. The Iranians want to cause as many difficulties for us as possible. So, just as the Democrats saw a stabilizing situation in Iraq, where, despite all the incompetency, the peace just might be won, the Iranians have joined the traitorous party (that happens to share all their talking points with Osama bin Laden) in trying to turn Turkey against us.
Simply put: if Turkish troops enter Northern Iraq, it diverts US forces and causes more problems and chaos to deal with. That sure is helpful for Hillary's presidential run, and the enemies' interests, but not America's. Think about it. How could they have NOT done this on purpose?
Naturally, America at large still does nothing. Of what few voices America has left that will tell the truth and be patriotic, few of those are even reporting this adequately. Radio host Michael Savage sees what I (and surely many others) see, and talks about it at length. I wouldn't be surprised if Mark Levin sees it as well (I honestly haven't checked.) Rush Limbaugh will come to understand this in a day or two and talk about it, just behind the true originals, only to point out that the Democrats are bad and made a bad move, which is all he ever says anyway. Sean Hannity will probably take a week, (he tends to get his news stories from Rush), and Bill O'Reilly will likely never cover this story. Fake conservatives like Glenn Beck will almost surely never give the story proper coverage, probably none at all. (What do you expect from a guy on CNN?) No one bothers to listen to Bush anymore, including me, most of the time, or any of his people. He has become perhaps the earliest lame duck ever. There are no congressional leaders on the Republican side that are taking the reigns of conservatism in any way, talking about this issue in any way. The religious of this country have absolutely no central voice or leadership at all. What few known conservative authors such as Anne Coulter don't even matter anymore, and are taken little more as ranting entertainers with nothing actually important to say, as they should be. (Unless, of course, a liberal wants talking-point ammunition against conservatives). My point is: even most of the voices of the fractured and almost dead conservative movement, as well as the Republicans (who are NOT part of the conservative movement anymore), aren't calling this what it is. What ever happened to the "influence" of Fox News? The people of this country remain ignorant or indifferent towards this seditious act, and our great nation grows weaker.
Oh, one more thing: Tom Lantos should stand next to Pelosi in the treason trial I talked about before.
PKK members are attacking Turkey. Reports are coming in that Turkish troops are already entering Northern Iraq in small numbers, which may or may not be true. Oil prices are at record highs because the PKK has threatened that it might target pipelines that go through Iraq and/or Turkey.
Now why would the PKK want to provoke Turkey now? My guess is that Iran is pulling their strings. I am just waiting for evidence to surface (look to talk radio, CNN won't cover this probably ever) that Iranian weapons, maybe intelligence, is being supplied to the PKK. Why? Simple. The Iranians want to cause as many difficulties for us as possible. So, just as the Democrats saw a stabilizing situation in Iraq, where, despite all the incompetency, the peace just might be won, the Iranians have joined the traitorous party (that happens to share all their talking points with Osama bin Laden) in trying to turn Turkey against us.
Simply put: if Turkish troops enter Northern Iraq, it diverts US forces and causes more problems and chaos to deal with. That sure is helpful for Hillary's presidential run, and the enemies' interests, but not America's. Think about it. How could they have NOT done this on purpose?
Naturally, America at large still does nothing. Of what few voices America has left that will tell the truth and be patriotic, few of those are even reporting this adequately. Radio host Michael Savage sees what I (and surely many others) see, and talks about it at length. I wouldn't be surprised if Mark Levin sees it as well (I honestly haven't checked.) Rush Limbaugh will come to understand this in a day or two and talk about it, just behind the true originals, only to point out that the Democrats are bad and made a bad move, which is all he ever says anyway. Sean Hannity will probably take a week, (he tends to get his news stories from Rush), and Bill O'Reilly will likely never cover this story. Fake conservatives like Glenn Beck will almost surely never give the story proper coverage, probably none at all. (What do you expect from a guy on CNN?) No one bothers to listen to Bush anymore, including me, most of the time, or any of his people. He has become perhaps the earliest lame duck ever. There are no congressional leaders on the Republican side that are taking the reigns of conservatism in any way, talking about this issue in any way. The religious of this country have absolutely no central voice or leadership at all. What few known conservative authors such as Anne Coulter don't even matter anymore, and are taken little more as ranting entertainers with nothing actually important to say, as they should be. (Unless, of course, a liberal wants talking-point ammunition against conservatives). My point is: even most of the voices of the fractured and almost dead conservative movement, as well as the Republicans (who are NOT part of the conservative movement anymore), aren't calling this what it is. What ever happened to the "influence" of Fox News? The people of this country remain ignorant or indifferent towards this seditious act, and our great nation grows weaker.
Oh, one more thing: Tom Lantos should stand next to Pelosi in the treason trial I talked about before.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
State of the Union- Treason Ignored
Ladies and gentlemen, my fellow Americans, other foreign nationals, if you care (except you illegals- I don't care what you have to say or think), I have dire news. It seems America has entered an age of decadence, laziness, and corruption greater than any time in our history- to the point of national and societal suicide. I say this because members of our own government have committed treason, in the strictest sense of the word, even qualified under the narrow definition provided by our constitution. I say this because the American people have not risen up in outrage and protest at this treason. I say this because the American media in large part has been almost completely silent. Finally, I say this because if this pattern continues, there won't be an America as we know it for our children or grandchildren.
Treason, according to the constitution, requires either waging war against the United States or any part of it, or- and this is the important one today- aiding the United States' enemies. It was not technically treason when Nancy Pelosi visited Syria, (unless she did things I am not aware of, which is possible), badmouthed the US on Middle Eastern, Muslim, anti-American TV, sent messages opposite the commander in chief, all while wearing an insulting Muslim headscarf. (She probably would have worn a burkha, but then no one would have known it was her. By the way, where are the femi-nazis on this one?) If you read the constitution, as deplorable an act as that was, and she should be kicked out of office in disgrace for it, it was not treason. However, since then, Pelosi and her cronies (I am still working on a more complete list of who exactly masterminded this treasonous filth) have seditiously betrayed our country. If we had any legitimate leadership in this country, they would already be held responsible.
A quick overview of relevant history for you libs out there who hardly know what the word history means: In 1915, nearing the end of WWI, Turks of the Ottoman empire were involved in the killing of millions of Armenians. Many historians have labeled it genocide, they are likely correct. The Turks are still very sensitive about the issue. Also, our congress has condemned this incident as genocide twice already! Since then, Armenians still inhabit parts of Turkey, as do Kurds. Kurds, another race in the area (without a country of their own, thanks to a poor job carving the area up when the Ottoman empire fell as WWI came to a close), occupy the southern parts of Turkey and northern parts of Iraq. To sum up the Kurds' condition- they're used to being picked on and killed by now. Saddam tested his chemical (WMDs!!!) weapons on them, Turkish police and military regularly harass them. However, it should be noted that among all the Muslim inhabited countries in the area, Turkey is one of the most moderate- with a secular government, relatively high standard of living, and relatively high education. Turkey even considered joining the European Union for some time. Finally, there is an extremist group of Kurds called the PKK that do commit acts of terrorism in Turkey.
The most important thing to note about Turkey right now is that they are an ally in our war poorly named War on Terror, (war on fundamentalist Islam , I might call it), especially with Iraq. 70% of the supplies for our troops go through Turkey. Because Pelosi and co. have yet to do anything to end the war as promised, because they don't really have the support or backbones to cut funding (which is all congress can really do anyway), they have become more devious. Their tactic of undermining the effort has been taken to a new level.
Sun Tzu, perhaps the truest master of war in history, explained that the best way to win conflicts is to not even draw your sword (fire as shot). First, he said, you attack strategies and future plans of your enemies, then you attack alliances (Pelosi has certainly been undermining our alliances, hasn't she?) then you attack supply lines (then his armies, and last his walled cities- or fortified positions). He stresses more times than I bother to count that supply lines are absolutely crucial to any military effort. He was right thousands of years ago, and is no less right today. What our enemy, the Al Quaeda Islamist Fascist out there has always sought to do more than fight our army, which it cannot defeat, is to fight our policies. They seek to wear down our political will, and break our morale. It worked for the Vietcong. In fact, the communists in North Vietnam were ready to surrender when the US pulled out. Osama learned that, and now believes he, too, can break our will.
Nancy Pelosi has gone a step further. In order to aid our enemy, she has decided to attack our supply lines, and our alliances. She and her cronies have put forth a third resolution, NOW OF ALL TIMES, to condemn an incident that occurred over ninety years ago. Talk about a coincidence that the people she is royally ticking off have the power to cut off more than half our supplies. Not to mention the fact that many within their government want to invade northern Iraq, which would be a disaster for our forces. (96% of their parliament just voted to let the army move in.) Make no mistake about it, Pelosi is aiding the enemy in time of war. She has, in the passing of one ridiculous resolution, attacked the United States armed forces' future plans, alliances, and supply lines. She has committed treason.
The penalty for treason, as laid out in the constitution, can be death. Am I calling for that? No, not yet. If, IF Pelosi's little plot works, and our troops are cut off from supplies... I'd call for her immediate trial. At that trial, the death penalty should be on the table. Most definitely. If our own leadership actively works against our military, forget about a private citizen doing so (Jane Fonda), somebody's head should role. Whoever else helped her mastermind this little coup should also be put on trial. Now, I understand that this is a dangerous path. History is littered with instances of a nation's leaders being assassinated so that others can gather and solidify power. (See almost any chapter of Rome's history, or Hitler's "night of long knives.") Still, treason is treason. We sent Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to the electric chair for giving the Soviets classified nuclear secrets, what Pelosi is trying to do is just as bad. Every mis-representative that sign this resolution should be kicked out of the House and forbidden from ever holding public office again. Make no mistake about it- they wish to antagonize an ally into turning against us, and they knew exactly what they were doing.
People may call this an attempt to make it a punishable offense to oppose the war, but that isn't true; and deep down, even the biggest lib knows it. Opposition and treason are very different things. The fact of the matter is: if we had legitimate leadership, or legitimate participation of the people in their government, this would already be discussed in larger forums than this post. This is not freedom of speech, this is not innocent politics, this is treason. I'm going to keep saying it until it gets through.
As it happens, Pelosi is already making excuses for her actions. She actually pointed out in an interview, despite the fact that the President has called on congress not to do this, that he had never actually called her personally. So, apparently, that makes it okay. After all, this is just a resolution in accordance with "American values," as she says. Boy, if only Benedict Arnold had thought of that. Well, gee, he could have argued, the President never actually ordered me not to conspire with the British, so, it's all okay, right? Helping people (the Brits) is just what Americans do! We're good people! You see that? Even she knows what she is diong is wrong, but, apparently just like the public, she doesn't care.
There are other effects worth mentioning quickly- first (kudos to Michael Savage for pointing this possibility out), she might be trying to court the Armenian vote. Armenians tend to be very conservative, because they learned the hardest of ways to know better than to give in to liberal ideas like appeasement and overall weakness. (Thus, the genocide in discussion.) I kind of doubt this, seeing how small the Armenian vote is, but it is still a possibility.
Also, everyone is probably noticing their gas prices going up this week. Well, tensions in Turkey mean crude oil price raises, so you libs out there can stop blaming Bush, who has nothing to do with it, and thank Pelosi for that price hike. (What does she care? She wants a fifty cent per gallon tax on gas anyway.) She and her fellow apparatchik (google it if you don't know) have incited so much trouble already that gas prices are going up.
Back to the important part. Pelosi and her buddies (I bet Reid and Hillary had a lot to do with this, not to mention several others) have actively, ACTIVELY moved to aid our enemies and hurt our own soldiers. They mean to attack not only our plans and alliances, which might squeeze by the narrow definition of treason in this country, but our very supply lines. That isn't like voting to cut off the funding to the war effort, it's seeking to make an enemy out of a friend and cut our soldiers off from their food, ammunition, medical supplies, fuel, weapons, reinforcements, everything. Those traitors did this on purpose, and we the people sit by. IT'S TREASON! Do you hear me!? TREASON! Read the Constitution!!! If Turkey cuts off our supply lines, if ONE American soldier is harmed in any way because Turkey moves into northern Iraq, Pelosi ought to be given a swift trial, taken out back and shot. The same goes for anyone who helped her do this, should one American be harmed because of this. Rather than hold anyone responsible, as usual, the media reports Turkey's actions, but is silent about why. Conservative media reports what happens, the audiences listens, and acts like its no worse than anything else the Democrats have done. THIS IS SEDITION!!! LITERALLY! The public at large should be so outraged that Pelosi has to increase her bodyguard detail, but the people are as blissfully ignorant or complacent as ever. I'll bet anything she gets away with this. She'll be reelected for this in her whacked-out district in Commie-fornia. This is why I say that we are committing national and societal suicide. We can't even recognize treason when it glares us in the face with a big neon sign that says "I'm a traitor." It's no wonder liberals are less likely to have children, just think about it. When a country behaves in this manner, when its leadership commits treason and its people do nothing about it, how can it possibly survive?
Treason, according to the constitution, requires either waging war against the United States or any part of it, or- and this is the important one today- aiding the United States' enemies. It was not technically treason when Nancy Pelosi visited Syria, (unless she did things I am not aware of, which is possible), badmouthed the US on Middle Eastern, Muslim, anti-American TV, sent messages opposite the commander in chief, all while wearing an insulting Muslim headscarf. (She probably would have worn a burkha, but then no one would have known it was her. By the way, where are the femi-nazis on this one?) If you read the constitution, as deplorable an act as that was, and she should be kicked out of office in disgrace for it, it was not treason. However, since then, Pelosi and her cronies (I am still working on a more complete list of who exactly masterminded this treasonous filth) have seditiously betrayed our country. If we had any legitimate leadership in this country, they would already be held responsible.
A quick overview of relevant history for you libs out there who hardly know what the word history means: In 1915, nearing the end of WWI, Turks of the Ottoman empire were involved in the killing of millions of Armenians. Many historians have labeled it genocide, they are likely correct. The Turks are still very sensitive about the issue. Also, our congress has condemned this incident as genocide twice already! Since then, Armenians still inhabit parts of Turkey, as do Kurds. Kurds, another race in the area (without a country of their own, thanks to a poor job carving the area up when the Ottoman empire fell as WWI came to a close), occupy the southern parts of Turkey and northern parts of Iraq. To sum up the Kurds' condition- they're used to being picked on and killed by now. Saddam tested his chemical (WMDs!!!) weapons on them, Turkish police and military regularly harass them. However, it should be noted that among all the Muslim inhabited countries in the area, Turkey is one of the most moderate- with a secular government, relatively high standard of living, and relatively high education. Turkey even considered joining the European Union for some time. Finally, there is an extremist group of Kurds called the PKK that do commit acts of terrorism in Turkey.
The most important thing to note about Turkey right now is that they are an ally in our war poorly named War on Terror, (war on fundamentalist Islam , I might call it), especially with Iraq. 70% of the supplies for our troops go through Turkey. Because Pelosi and co. have yet to do anything to end the war as promised, because they don't really have the support or backbones to cut funding (which is all congress can really do anyway), they have become more devious. Their tactic of undermining the effort has been taken to a new level.
Sun Tzu, perhaps the truest master of war in history, explained that the best way to win conflicts is to not even draw your sword (fire as shot). First, he said, you attack strategies and future plans of your enemies, then you attack alliances (Pelosi has certainly been undermining our alliances, hasn't she?) then you attack supply lines (then his armies, and last his walled cities- or fortified positions). He stresses more times than I bother to count that supply lines are absolutely crucial to any military effort. He was right thousands of years ago, and is no less right today. What our enemy, the Al Quaeda Islamist Fascist out there has always sought to do more than fight our army, which it cannot defeat, is to fight our policies. They seek to wear down our political will, and break our morale. It worked for the Vietcong. In fact, the communists in North Vietnam were ready to surrender when the US pulled out. Osama learned that, and now believes he, too, can break our will.
Nancy Pelosi has gone a step further. In order to aid our enemy, she has decided to attack our supply lines, and our alliances. She and her cronies have put forth a third resolution, NOW OF ALL TIMES, to condemn an incident that occurred over ninety years ago. Talk about a coincidence that the people she is royally ticking off have the power to cut off more than half our supplies. Not to mention the fact that many within their government want to invade northern Iraq, which would be a disaster for our forces. (96% of their parliament just voted to let the army move in.) Make no mistake about it, Pelosi is aiding the enemy in time of war. She has, in the passing of one ridiculous resolution, attacked the United States armed forces' future plans, alliances, and supply lines. She has committed treason.
The penalty for treason, as laid out in the constitution, can be death. Am I calling for that? No, not yet. If, IF Pelosi's little plot works, and our troops are cut off from supplies... I'd call for her immediate trial. At that trial, the death penalty should be on the table. Most definitely. If our own leadership actively works against our military, forget about a private citizen doing so (Jane Fonda), somebody's head should role. Whoever else helped her mastermind this little coup should also be put on trial. Now, I understand that this is a dangerous path. History is littered with instances of a nation's leaders being assassinated so that others can gather and solidify power. (See almost any chapter of Rome's history, or Hitler's "night of long knives.") Still, treason is treason. We sent Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to the electric chair for giving the Soviets classified nuclear secrets, what Pelosi is trying to do is just as bad. Every mis-representative that sign this resolution should be kicked out of the House and forbidden from ever holding public office again. Make no mistake about it- they wish to antagonize an ally into turning against us, and they knew exactly what they were doing.
People may call this an attempt to make it a punishable offense to oppose the war, but that isn't true; and deep down, even the biggest lib knows it. Opposition and treason are very different things. The fact of the matter is: if we had legitimate leadership, or legitimate participation of the people in their government, this would already be discussed in larger forums than this post. This is not freedom of speech, this is not innocent politics, this is treason. I'm going to keep saying it until it gets through.
As it happens, Pelosi is already making excuses for her actions. She actually pointed out in an interview, despite the fact that the President has called on congress not to do this, that he had never actually called her personally. So, apparently, that makes it okay. After all, this is just a resolution in accordance with "American values," as she says. Boy, if only Benedict Arnold had thought of that. Well, gee, he could have argued, the President never actually ordered me not to conspire with the British, so, it's all okay, right? Helping people (the Brits) is just what Americans do! We're good people! You see that? Even she knows what she is diong is wrong, but, apparently just like the public, she doesn't care.
There are other effects worth mentioning quickly- first (kudos to Michael Savage for pointing this possibility out), she might be trying to court the Armenian vote. Armenians tend to be very conservative, because they learned the hardest of ways to know better than to give in to liberal ideas like appeasement and overall weakness. (Thus, the genocide in discussion.) I kind of doubt this, seeing how small the Armenian vote is, but it is still a possibility.
Also, everyone is probably noticing their gas prices going up this week. Well, tensions in Turkey mean crude oil price raises, so you libs out there can stop blaming Bush, who has nothing to do with it, and thank Pelosi for that price hike. (What does she care? She wants a fifty cent per gallon tax on gas anyway.) She and her fellow apparatchik (google it if you don't know) have incited so much trouble already that gas prices are going up.
Back to the important part. Pelosi and her buddies (I bet Reid and Hillary had a lot to do with this, not to mention several others) have actively, ACTIVELY moved to aid our enemies and hurt our own soldiers. They mean to attack not only our plans and alliances, which might squeeze by the narrow definition of treason in this country, but our very supply lines. That isn't like voting to cut off the funding to the war effort, it's seeking to make an enemy out of a friend and cut our soldiers off from their food, ammunition, medical supplies, fuel, weapons, reinforcements, everything. Those traitors did this on purpose, and we the people sit by. IT'S TREASON! Do you hear me!? TREASON! Read the Constitution!!! If Turkey cuts off our supply lines, if ONE American soldier is harmed in any way because Turkey moves into northern Iraq, Pelosi ought to be given a swift trial, taken out back and shot. The same goes for anyone who helped her do this, should one American be harmed because of this. Rather than hold anyone responsible, as usual, the media reports Turkey's actions, but is silent about why. Conservative media reports what happens, the audiences listens, and acts like its no worse than anything else the Democrats have done. THIS IS SEDITION!!! LITERALLY! The public at large should be so outraged that Pelosi has to increase her bodyguard detail, but the people are as blissfully ignorant or complacent as ever. I'll bet anything she gets away with this. She'll be reelected for this in her whacked-out district in Commie-fornia. This is why I say that we are committing national and societal suicide. We can't even recognize treason when it glares us in the face with a big neon sign that says "I'm a traitor." It's no wonder liberals are less likely to have children, just think about it. When a country behaves in this manner, when its leadership commits treason and its people do nothing about it, how can it possibly survive?
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Liberals in Real Life 2
I didn't expect to write another of these so soon, but I had an incredibly funny, and sad, conversation today in line at the grocery store today. I feel compelled to write this before the memory fades and details are lost. Again, as in the last post, I have to say that I am not making this story up, and I am not exaggerating anything. It's ridiculous, I know. In fact, it's almost unbelievable. But it really did happen.
I was with my girlfriend, waiting in line with our food, and there's that ridiculous Time magazine issue completely dedicated to Al Gore's big swindle. You know, the one with the polar bear standing on some ice that's in a big patch of broken ice floating in the arctic somewhere, looking all hungry and skinny (because he just came out of hibernation.) Personally, I look through magazines like this and make fun of what's inside: you know, the obsolete science that has been disproved, the wonders of wind power (even though environmentalists hate it too because it kills birds), just to pass the time until I get to the front of the line. The lady in front of me though, well, she was definitely either a liberal or under their mind control. Probably both, but more of the latter.
She casually comments to us how it's just so sad about the polar bears, saying how she thinks about the poor things drowning all the time. Naturally, I have to let her know that there is, in fact, no evidence of such drownings- at all- as only four polar bears have ever been found drowned. She counters by asking how anyone could find drowned polar bears if they're under water. Well, people can go under water too, you know. They're called scuba divers. (I didn't say that.) That's how they found the incredibly few they did. (By the way, polar bears have always drowned from time to time. It happens. Animals in nature die.) She acted as if I hadn't said anything, thought, completely ignoring it, when I pointed out my fact and the logic behind it. Her emotions didn't care.
Okay, so I'm dealing with a complete brainwashed ignoramus, (that word is defined as "an extremely ignorant person" before you accuse me of name-calling), so I go in to comedy mode. I say, well hey, maybe the polar bears are having a rough time, but at least all the walruses are okay. I mean, think about it, if there are less polar bears because of drownings, the walruses won't get killed and eaten so much. So it's good for them, at least. No one ever thinks of the walruses. A valid point, I think, and it's at least a little funny, right? Nothing. Not even a crack of a courtesy smile. No sense of humor in this lady whatsoever. She wasn't offended, per say, but she did feel she still knew what she was talking about as she rambled on about polar bears some more. This lady was in to this stuff. To her credit, she wasn't the angry type of liberal. She never got all mean faced and snotty or sassy or anything like that. I suppose that counts for something. Anyway, I just kind of drifted off with my talking saying it's all a lie, shaking my head.
At this point I had exited the conversation, because, well, some people just can't be helped. (See post "Useful Idiots and Political Correctness" and read about the useful idiots... because she was a big one.) However, she kept talking with my girlfriend, and she revealed just how disturbed she was- not just about the polar bears, but flat out disturbed in general. I'm talking about the level that would earn her a spot in a commercial for Al Gore's presidential run next to poor ol' Cindy Sheehan. It turns out that she felt so distraught about the poor polar bears drowning, (we're talking just the polar bears here, if you haven't noticed, not the rest of the world's alleged doomsday or anything), that she said she couldn't sleep at night and had to go on antidepressants. Yes, you read that right. Antidepressants. Al Gore's movie and the nightly news with pictures of polar bears and Time magazine and whatever else have all been so disturbing to her, despite all the evidence to the contrary of this ridiculous theory, which I'm sure she ignores because it's not presented emotionally, that she started popping happy pills.
...
Well there you go.
I was with my girlfriend, waiting in line with our food, and there's that ridiculous Time magazine issue completely dedicated to Al Gore's big swindle. You know, the one with the polar bear standing on some ice that's in a big patch of broken ice floating in the arctic somewhere, looking all hungry and skinny (because he just came out of hibernation.) Personally, I look through magazines like this and make fun of what's inside: you know, the obsolete science that has been disproved, the wonders of wind power (even though environmentalists hate it too because it kills birds), just to pass the time until I get to the front of the line. The lady in front of me though, well, she was definitely either a liberal or under their mind control. Probably both, but more of the latter.
She casually comments to us how it's just so sad about the polar bears, saying how she thinks about the poor things drowning all the time. Naturally, I have to let her know that there is, in fact, no evidence of such drownings- at all- as only four polar bears have ever been found drowned. She counters by asking how anyone could find drowned polar bears if they're under water. Well, people can go under water too, you know. They're called scuba divers. (I didn't say that.) That's how they found the incredibly few they did. (By the way, polar bears have always drowned from time to time. It happens. Animals in nature die.) She acted as if I hadn't said anything, thought, completely ignoring it, when I pointed out my fact and the logic behind it. Her emotions didn't care.
Okay, so I'm dealing with a complete brainwashed ignoramus, (that word is defined as "an extremely ignorant person" before you accuse me of name-calling), so I go in to comedy mode. I say, well hey, maybe the polar bears are having a rough time, but at least all the walruses are okay. I mean, think about it, if there are less polar bears because of drownings, the walruses won't get killed and eaten so much. So it's good for them, at least. No one ever thinks of the walruses. A valid point, I think, and it's at least a little funny, right? Nothing. Not even a crack of a courtesy smile. No sense of humor in this lady whatsoever. She wasn't offended, per say, but she did feel she still knew what she was talking about as she rambled on about polar bears some more. This lady was in to this stuff. To her credit, she wasn't the angry type of liberal. She never got all mean faced and snotty or sassy or anything like that. I suppose that counts for something. Anyway, I just kind of drifted off with my talking saying it's all a lie, shaking my head.
At this point I had exited the conversation, because, well, some people just can't be helped. (See post "Useful Idiots and Political Correctness" and read about the useful idiots... because she was a big one.) However, she kept talking with my girlfriend, and she revealed just how disturbed she was- not just about the polar bears, but flat out disturbed in general. I'm talking about the level that would earn her a spot in a commercial for Al Gore's presidential run next to poor ol' Cindy Sheehan. It turns out that she felt so distraught about the poor polar bears drowning, (we're talking just the polar bears here, if you haven't noticed, not the rest of the world's alleged doomsday or anything), that she said she couldn't sleep at night and had to go on antidepressants. Yes, you read that right. Antidepressants. Al Gore's movie and the nightly news with pictures of polar bears and Time magazine and whatever else have all been so disturbing to her, despite all the evidence to the contrary of this ridiculous theory, which I'm sure she ignores because it's not presented emotionally, that she started popping happy pills.
...
Well there you go.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Monday, October 1, 2007
Liberals In Real Life 1
You probably noticed that there is a number one at the end of this post's title. That is because I intend to make many of these types of posts. Some may be drawn from my own personal experiences, others from the experiences of my friends, stories related to me, depicted, whatever. However, they will all show liberals for what they really are.
I took an elective class in college (I was required to) that was mostly a waste of time as far as education is concerned. My major was a hard science, mind you, not liberal arts or something stupid that would do little more than get me a good section waiting at Olive Garden. Anyway, the one good thing this class had to offer was a LOT of field trips. They were all at a relevant place in the area, and all were very informative.
There was one, I remember clearly still, at which the owner of a company, very successful, showed us automated robots that would assemble the majority of a circuit board at amazing speeds. However, the machines were limited in their dexterity. So, just outside, the owner showed us the "low-tech side" (his words) of the assembly process. It was a bunch of ladies putting certain pieces on to the circuit boards that were just too complex for the robot arms to handle. He said hi to them, was very nice, they said hi back, then we moved on.
Later after the field trip a bunch of guys wanted to blow off their next class and get some beers. I went along because I wasn't even in the class they were blowing off. One of them, a guy whose name I don't even remember, was the total hippie type. Long hair, went hiking in the mountains a lot, (in fact, after having a little too much beer, with his inhibitions freed, that's what he did across the street when we all left); basically a total "peace dude" pot smoker.
Well, when still inside we were all talking, and this hippie kid mentioned that he thought it was "total bulls--t" how the owner referred to the workers mentioned above. As if he were condescending to them or something. Now, I assure you, he wasn't at all. He called their part of the operation low tech because it was low tech. That's what low tech means. He didn't say low skilled or anything. He just accurately described matters. I guess to a lib being accurate with words about a matter that isn't even sensitive to anyone is going too far. Yea, I don't get it either.
But the plot thickens. Come time to pay the bill, we had it split between all of us, which was a minor inconvenience for the waitress, but it happens and she didn't seem to mind. The waitress, by the way, was not treated well by a few of the guys in our little group, and the hippie kid had nothing to say about that at all. Apparently calling workers low tech in comparison with a robot is insulting, but giving a (quite good) waitress a hard time is a-okay. Anyway, when the bill came, he payed is part with exact change. Down to the penny. I don't even know where he got all those coins from, but that hypocritical liberal moron found enough change to not leave her a cent. I figured at the time that it'd be poor class to say something, though these days, I might just chew him out anyway. Apparently Mr. I-care-about-the-workers-so-much thought that the waitress who served us for two hours wasn't worth anything. Yea, I still don't get it either.
Just for the record, I left her a good tip.
Now, this story may sound fabricated, it just makes my point so well. But believe me, every word of it is true. No made up parts, not even any exagerations. It is the perfect example of the liberal mindset, and I watched it all happen myself. You will undoubtedly see more of these posts, for there are a lot more examples out there.
I took an elective class in college (I was required to) that was mostly a waste of time as far as education is concerned. My major was a hard science, mind you, not liberal arts or something stupid that would do little more than get me a good section waiting at Olive Garden. Anyway, the one good thing this class had to offer was a LOT of field trips. They were all at a relevant place in the area, and all were very informative.
There was one, I remember clearly still, at which the owner of a company, very successful, showed us automated robots that would assemble the majority of a circuit board at amazing speeds. However, the machines were limited in their dexterity. So, just outside, the owner showed us the "low-tech side" (his words) of the assembly process. It was a bunch of ladies putting certain pieces on to the circuit boards that were just too complex for the robot arms to handle. He said hi to them, was very nice, they said hi back, then we moved on.
Later after the field trip a bunch of guys wanted to blow off their next class and get some beers. I went along because I wasn't even in the class they were blowing off. One of them, a guy whose name I don't even remember, was the total hippie type. Long hair, went hiking in the mountains a lot, (in fact, after having a little too much beer, with his inhibitions freed, that's what he did across the street when we all left); basically a total "peace dude" pot smoker.
Well, when still inside we were all talking, and this hippie kid mentioned that he thought it was "total bulls--t" how the owner referred to the workers mentioned above. As if he were condescending to them or something. Now, I assure you, he wasn't at all. He called their part of the operation low tech because it was low tech. That's what low tech means. He didn't say low skilled or anything. He just accurately described matters. I guess to a lib being accurate with words about a matter that isn't even sensitive to anyone is going too far. Yea, I don't get it either.
But the plot thickens. Come time to pay the bill, we had it split between all of us, which was a minor inconvenience for the waitress, but it happens and she didn't seem to mind. The waitress, by the way, was not treated well by a few of the guys in our little group, and the hippie kid had nothing to say about that at all. Apparently calling workers low tech in comparison with a robot is insulting, but giving a (quite good) waitress a hard time is a-okay. Anyway, when the bill came, he payed is part with exact change. Down to the penny. I don't even know where he got all those coins from, but that hypocritical liberal moron found enough change to not leave her a cent. I figured at the time that it'd be poor class to say something, though these days, I might just chew him out anyway. Apparently Mr. I-care-about-the-workers-so-much thought that the waitress who served us for two hours wasn't worth anything. Yea, I still don't get it either.
Just for the record, I left her a good tip.
Now, this story may sound fabricated, it just makes my point so well. But believe me, every word of it is true. No made up parts, not even any exagerations. It is the perfect example of the liberal mindset, and I watched it all happen myself. You will undoubtedly see more of these posts, for there are a lot more examples out there.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
