A Slow Suicide 2

I almost forgot. Point 6 that I would like to see in the bailout, (not really because I don't want it)- the breaking up (it's called anti-trust, the first and better Roosevelt was known for it) of these giant mortgage banks, so that all our apples don't end up in one giant corrupt basket. Because the basket always ends up corrupt.

A Slow Suicide

So here it is. The big socialist bailout. The beginning of the communist takeover. The proof I never thought existed that Wall Street corporations and Washington insiders were one in the same. (Chris Dodd is leading this bailout, and he received the most money out of the long, long list of congressmen who the companies who are getting bailed out donated to. Oh, and the last three, I think, head of the federal reserve all come from what companies now? Google it, why don't you.) They say we will have a recession, nay, a depression, if we don't act and act now! Hurry, act, do anything, because anything is better than nothing, even if its the wrong thing! You believe this? I'm not so sure, while a recession may be coming, a depression? People on the streets begging like in the '30s? Really? The free market can't fix this? Are you sure? No, I have the solution! The doubling or tripling or more- don't think they'll stop at 700 billion, when has the government ever quoted something and not gone over? more on that later- of our debt to places like Dubai and China. That's the solution? And so many of you think it's a good idea?

Allow me to illustrate why it isn't by first pretending that it even could be. Let's pretend we said, okay, there's no other way, let's bail 'em out! Here are five contingencies that MUST be in the bailout bill, unconstitutional as it is, so to preserve any amount of freedom and integrity left in our broken, bastardized system.

1- All moneys within the bill must go to and only to the bail out. No pork barrels, pet projects, or pocket lining of any sort... Every dollar must be accounted for.

2- If, IF the federal government ends up making a profit off of the deal (buying the mortgages low, selling them high), ALL profits MUST be distributed- evenly according to tax bracket (meaning if you pay more taxes, you get more back, not the communist opposite that was the Chinese Funded Welfare Bribe)- back to the people immediately. Giving them back flat across the board would be a lousy compromise.

3- The government must be forced to sell once they would make a 10% profit (arbitrary number) on the mortgages, so to put them back in the free market, where they belong, rather than holding onto control like Chavez of Venezuela does.

4- Regulations that were once in place must be put back, and strictly enforced, so to prevent this from ever happening again. Regulations on what kind of mortgages are legal and not. More importantly, regulations must be put on government itself so to prevent them from PRESSURING mortgage giants into giving out loans they didn't even want to, because that (thanks, Bubba Clinton!) is at the foundation of all this mess.

5- All borrowed money must first come from American citizens then preferred allies, rather than the Chinese, Dubai, etc.

I bring up these five simple requirements that aren't for a reason. You know as well as I do that they will NOT be in the package. Congress will line their pockets like never before, on Chinese and terrorist-sympathizing money that you and I will pay back with interest. Moreover, and possibly worse of all, this sets a precedent. It sets a precedent for socialist, communist behavior, in which the government sticks its nose into the free market, screws it up completely (pressuring mortgage lenders to lend to people who should never get loans), then uses its screwing up of the market as an excuse to meddle further. And for profit, even! I'd prefer the government LOSE money on the deal rather than make it, and I'll tell you why:

Consider this: if they DO make a profit, do you think we will see that money? NO! There is no way in hell we will, I guarantee you. They will spend it all, and then some! More money in their coffers, they more they spend, that's just how it is. Only they always, always, ALWAYS, spend even more money than they have. Let's consider a best case scenario: they only spend 700 billion, when all is said and done- which would make my jaw hit the floor. They make a 10% profit, seeling the mortgages back to free market investers, so they make 70 billion dollars. They pay off the debt (don't laugh, it's just a hypothetical), and have the 70 billion left over. That's a 70 billion dollar spending increase, I promise you. You must know I'm right. But still, I will explain.

The following year, with the one-time 70 billion spent, they will want to do so again. Those socialists will NEED to do it again. No, actually, they will want to expand on that to 100 billion or more! "We can do better" will be the campaign slogan you hear. You watch. And since their one-time profit bonus is gone, the 70 billion spent so quickly, where will they get it next year? From YOU, of course! The tax payer. Government never rolls back what they do, they only let it grow. I will site social security and medicare as my examples, which are currently the biggest chunk of the budget, including Iraq.

Social security was supposed to be a separate, secure account for working Americans to pay in to (albeit forcibly) for their own retirement benefits. That was when it was created in the 1940s. Now you can emigrate here from anywhere in the world at the age of 65 and receive full benefits, having never given it a penny. Thank you, Carter! I wish that were the end of it, but there is actually a strong movement to actually give it to illegal invaders from down South. Can you believe it? Of course you can. This is all on top of the fact that, despite its supposed separation from the rest of the budget, congress has repeatedly dipped into it without paying it back, prematurely bankrupting the entire system. I say prematurely, of course, because it is the ultimate pyramid scheme. Literally. It is based on having more people paying into it than taking out of it. While true pyramid schemes are illegal in the USA, the USA federal government actually perpetuates the biggest one ever, forcing virtually all its working citizens into it. Ironic? No, just politic.

Don't forget the expansion into something called medicare, as well, especially the recent expansion to cover all these prescription drugs that we can't afford. Thank you, Bush! But maybe I'm wrong about it. Just ask anyone with an HMO, medicare is great...

Oh, by the way, those regulations coming back that would prevent this from happening... Do you think they will actually be there, and be enforced, and stay that way, what with so many poor minorities- who happen to have God-awful credit- can't get a house? Sure, yea, uh huh. And maybe people will actually study the founding fathers in detail in high school, too.

Quite frankly, I'd rather go ahead and have a full blown depression over this.

This bailout is such a disaster I don't even know where to start. That's why, if you noticed, I just jumped right in. It will result in more spending than ever. It will result in more corruption than ever. It will result in more debt than ever. It will result in our enemies having more power and more power over us than ever. It will result in a more socialist/communist stance taken by our government than ever. It will ultimately result in a weaker American than ever. If you buy the line that we have to or we'll hit a great depression, you probably would have bought Hitler's lines that the Nazies had to unleash the brownshirts or Germany would never be strong. Why do you think they're rushing so hard over the weekend to do it? People are busy with their lives in this country, but if they found the time to catch on to what the megalomaniacs in Washington are doing, they just might throw a fit! They might see through the media induced hysteria if given long enough. And then they would realize what I already know: this so-called "bailout" is slow national suicide.

On the Move 2

Last February, I warned that the pinko commies were on the move. Boy, was I ever right. And the movement is on both sides of the aisle, don't fool yourself. What am I talking about now? Oh, nothing much. Just tactics taken by our own government, "by the people of the people for the people" they used to say, that more closely resemble George Washington's nightmare and someone like Chavez's dream than anything else. Just the nationalization, meaning seizure, meaning GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two mortgage giants (banks) of America.

So, sleep tight, rest up for tomorrow, it's a brighter day. The government cares about you. They care so much, in fact, that they are slowly taking over private industry while almost nobody notices. Just watch your Soviet-like "debates" that are more like the pre-scripted show trials Stalin held than actual free-media hard hitting tough questioning interviews we used to get. It's all going to be okay, just let someone else take care of you.

You know, the liberals are often quoting Benjamin Franklin when criticizing national security measures like the Patriot Act. Those who would sacrifice their freedom for security deserve neither. And will wind up with neither. That was Ben's lesson to us. Well let us think about this. Freedom means free enterprise, right? It means the government does NOT control our businesses. Security, as the liberal, lying Bush administration is selling this fascist Soviet style takeover, this is anything but. But they sell us their version of government: meaning more, more, more of it; and less, less, less, private control (freedom.) It is time the liberals start listening to their own misquotes.

But hey, new election, right? Obama, Palin, Obama, Palin, Obama, Palin! (Gee, I forget, is Palin running for president, or just vice president?) That's what we care about, right? That's all that matters in the news today, so say your b-a-a-a-as, parrot O'Reilly's talking points from last night around the water cooler, try to sound smart and savvy to all your friends, and ignore what is really happening. After all, Palin seems like a true conservative, (so the Republicans seem to think, but are we really so sure?) And as Vice President, well, she can do... uh... well, nothing. And hey, Obama, Obama, he stands for change! So why worry, King George is almost out, how much more damage can he do? This fascist is yesterday's news. Look to the future!

Oh, I should mention that both presidential campaigns support the takeover.

Barry Hussein's VP

I will tell you right off the bat, I am impressed. Not with Barry Hussein, no, but with what I recently learned about his recently chosen VP running mate. Joseph Biden is a long time Democrat senate-whore, blah blah blah... but get this. He voted for the Iraq war, as did everyone (and as Barry would have at the time, after licking his finger and putting it to the wind), but soon became a critic of it. Oh, well, criticize the war eh? What a liberal Democrat moron, we hate him right? Not so fast, people, we should all criticize the war- specifically the people running it. Because they screwed it up. More than once. I know I do. That doesn't mean I want to lose.

But, it gets better. Now, I don't like most of what Joe here stands for, votes for, or wants, but he's rather moderate compared to Barry. Which is why he was chosen, of course. More on that some other time. However, Biden had a very, very smart idea for Iraq. Yes, that's right you Republicans who think you're conservatives; I, the independent thinker, have seen a bit of wisdom come from the greater of two evils. You see, apparently, Biden proposed early on that to obtain quick and lasting peace in Iraq, we should have divided it among ethnic lines.

Why, that's racist! You're promoting racism and hatred! How dare you? Shut up, you knee-jerk liberal morons, and listen. Iraq, well, the whole Middle East and nearby area (Islamic, anyway), has been split between two interpretations of Islam: the Shiia and the Sunni. Hopefully you have heard of it by now, seven years after 9-11. It is also a very racially separated place, from Turkey to Iran, and yes, Iraq, people draw lines between one another based on race. Did you know that Iran was once called Persia? That's right, Iranians are not Arabic, they are Persian. There are Turks in Turkey as well as others... And there exists another big group- the Kurds, in Northern Iraq, as well as the Sunni and Shiia... I hope you get the idea by now. Their hatred of one another dates thousands of years, you have clans or tribes that have feuded for just as long... I could go on. After WWII Churchill drew the lines in the sand as he did to keep these opposing forces fighting among themselves so that the British could dominate, and it worked back then. Now, for stability's sake (Al Qaeda thrives where situations are unstable, mind you), these different religious and ethnic groups need to get along. In this case, much like misbehaving, fighting children, they need to be separated. Both of you, go to your rooms! is the idea.

I have to point out: splitting up the country, which was artificially created, geographically, by a great leader of an age now passed, along more sensible lines; that is an idea that has only come from Joseph Biden the Senate-whore and Michael Savage talk show host, so far as I know. And it is at least, at least worth debating in an open and honest forum. In my opinion, it is likely the smartest thing we never did.

So there you have it. It turns out that even a half-backward Democrat liberal can have a good idea every now and then. If we didn't have this two-party system, who knows, maybe the idea would have received attention enough to have been executed, and we would be out of Iraq by now. And maybe, just maybe, a few less US soldiers would have paid the ultimate price for it. The lesson I teach in this post will surely be lost.

Now perhaps you ask, does this mean I am considering voting Obama this November?

Hell no.

Thanks, Guys Follow Up

So it turns out that Nancy the botox queen is almost single-handedly responsible for not voting on drilling domestic oil. Yes, that is correct, a good number of her own party (undoubtedly checking to see which way the political wind is blowing) even wanted to call it to a vote, but she, the speaker of the House of Misrepresentatives, refused to let it be brought up. A special thanks goes out to her again.

Oh, also... It turns out she didn't even turn off the lights. She kicked out the news media, of course, so that the few conservatives choosing to stick around and go on record about drilling oil, could only be heard only by tourists visiting the building. But she only dimmed the lights. So now I guess she needs to get two tune-ups and brand new tires, not just inflate them.

Thanks, Guys!

Sometimes I have to conclude that there is no difference between the Rs and the Ds. Other times, I have to conclude that the Ds are pure evil, like Hitler, with the concentration camps and all that; and the Rs are a lesser evil, like a mafia boss who has people killed all the time, but still gives the waiter a big tip at the steakhouse. Today is the latter.

As of August- that's today- the Democrats controlling Congress have shut the doors. Kicked the press out. Turned off the lights (very green of them to remember to do so). And gone home. The speaker of the House did one last thing before leaving for her vacation: congratulated herself and her party. After all, a 9% approval rating- the lowest in the history of this country- is quite a feat. Meanwhile, America is screaming, pleading, dying for something to help them from these incredibly high gas prices. The most obvious solution to anyone even in high school- and remember how dumb you were in high school- is to DRILL OUR OWN OIL!!! I won't get into what a "futures market" is, and I don't feel like spending the time explaining what "speculation" is, but it's not all market manipulation. It has a purpose, and the people who do speculate the market, and purchase futures, are smart to do so. With that, I repeat: DRILLING OUR OWN OIL WOULD CUT GAS PRICES BY A THIRD OR MORE IN A MONTH!

And yet, they skirt the issue, telling lies, spinning statements, and refusing to do a thing beyond voting to let the FDA regulate cigarettes, (that means they just attained more power), and naming post offices after people. They get in front of cameras and microphones and say that oil companies haven't even tapped all their available resources. It's a lie! They haven't tapped all their land, because only some of it has oil for the tapping! They say we can get by on wind power (that's you, Mr. Reid, who just happens to own acres and acres of land that would skyrocket in value if wind generators were put on them.) But if you do the math, that is one of the most absurd claims ever!

Then, their presidential candidate comes around saying he wants to tax the oil companies in order to give a thousand ever-depreciating dollars to every family for their energy costs, as if that wouldn't drive the price ever higher. Oh, yea, that'll teach 'em, those dirty stinking oil companies! Speaking of stupid Obama ideas, he claims- he really said this, I heard it!- that we can save just as much oil as we could ever drill in our own county by- get this: getting regular tune ups and properly inflating our tires. The billions and billions of barrels of oil could apparently be "offset" by tuning up our cars. And inflating our tires correctly. Like no one does that already. Just imagine how many billions of barrels of oil we're wasting by having our tires at 35 psi instead of 40... I guess this bumps Dirty Harry's all-time most absurd statement to the number two spot.

Oh, I almost forgot: when it comes to nuclear power, they vote that one down, too.

Even the Rs (which stands for "retarded," meaning "slowed") were trying to get votes passed to help America out of this energy crisis before it gets worse. Oh, by the way, it isn't bad yet. It has only just begun relative to the next decade or two- if we don't do anything about it. What a surprise, I'm so shocked. Nancy, Harry, and the rest of those George Soros Marxist cronies have found another way to weaken America, yet again. They're nothing if not resourceful.

Oh, on a quick tangent- a study was done on Al Gore's giant house, and it was determined that he uses far more energy- per square foot, even, not just overall, than five average American households, at least! Not accounting for the fact that his house is huge, he uses twenty times as much energy as the average American! So, in order to save face, he outfitted his whole house with those stupid light bulbs that take less energy but contain poisonous mercury, put up solar panels, etc etc etc... Well, this past year, his energy consumption after all that coming off the power grid (meaning coming from polluting sources like oil and coal, not his stupid solar panels) rose another ten percent! Combine that with all his private jet use and, call me crazy, I don't think he cares about the environment when he tells us we should abandon oil and coal all together in ten years.

Now might be a good time to mention that, putting aside his mountain of faults, McCain has actually called for the lifting of gas taxes- which happen to be over three times as much as oil profits on every gallon. We're talking something like 30-40 cents a gallon, here! The call has been entirely ignored by the Ds (standing for dumba-, well, you know), who would never, ever, not in a million years, even dream of letting go of a tax! Not when that is their power base and source of control over us all. Come to think of it, how often does the government give something up once it takes it?

I should also remind you that ten years ago, Bill Clinton vetoed legislation that would allow drilling in Alaska, and one of his bigger arguments against it was that "it'd take ten years before we even saw a drop." Well, it would have taken less, but here we are, ten years later,and looky here... boy do we need it more than ever! Apparently Nancy the Botox queen hasn't learned.

Or maybe she has. Maybe the fact that Americans are weakened and suffering more (relative to our own past, not the rest of the world) is a good thing to her. After all, the weaker a populace is, the easier it is to subjugate them. I'll give her credit for one thing though, at least she's somewhat sly about it. Barry Hussein is actually out there saying- and I heard him say it- that he wants to slow our military's technological advancement. He wants to stop improving the United Sates' military technology. You know, since we're ahead of the world now, by about as long as two presidential terms (eight years, for you math whizzes), as the rest of the world's nations continue to advance their technology, we should just stop. Another wonderful long term solution. What a great idea. I wonder if in ten years the media, once a country like China had caught up to us in technology, would continue at large to ignore the stupid mistake Barry made, just like they ignore what ol' Bubba did ten years ago by refusing to tap America's oil resources in the near lifeless, frozen tundra of Alaska. Sounds about right to me.

Anyway, I'd like to say thanks to Nancy, Harry, Barry, and the rest. Thank you all so much! At least you turned the lights out before you left. That ought to help drive down prices. Just don't forget to inflate your tires.

Two Card Monte

Have you ever heard of the game called Three Card Monte? I bet you know it, even if you don't know the name. You have surely seen it on TV, or if you live in New York and it isn't out of fashion yet, you have seen it being played on the streets. People will try and hustle you with a table set up and three cards on it. Two are, say, black kings, and one is a red king. He shows you the red king, then says keep your eye on it, then shuffles them around, and if you can point to it again, you win the money, yay! But if you don't he wins your money, boo! Sometimes you see this game played with three cups, and a ball is under it. The trick is, of course, that the guy playing the game has two or three mean looking friends making sure you pay up, even if you point out that he is cheating. Often times, by the end, all three cards are black kings, for the hustler has used his practiced skill called sleight of hand to remove the red king and replace it with another black king.

That is not to say, however, that you need to cheat to do this. You can search youtube and see some very skilled card handlers do this without cheating, meaning there is always a red king with the two blacks (or vice-versa), but he or she will still use their magician skills to trick you. Follow the red king, see it? See it? There it goes, back around again, keep your eye on the red, and where is it? Middle? Ohhh, sorry, it was over here, but thanks for playing.

This game reminds me of our nation's politics. I was listening to a morning radio show one day, a talk show, but not really a political show. They talk about all sorts of subjects, from politics to American Idol to their favorite cheese. The two men, one of which is supposedly "informed" because he watches CNN and Fox News all day (go ahead and roll your eyes and scoff with me), and one background low class joke maker, and the one woman, an ignorant liberal whose heart bleeds for every one except the white male and/or American interest, all agreed that there is no way- no way- that a Republican should win the next presidential election because of how terrible a job Bush has done.

Did you catch that?

There's your new game, Two Card Monte. It is so very sad to think that on the street, a hustler needs three cards to pull off the scam, but apparently the politicians need only two to fool pathetic America at large. What on earth does the next president have to do with the last one!? I can think of plenty of reasons that McCain should not be elected, believe me, and plenty more still that Obama shouldn't. But, unlike so many of my ignorant, two-tone-seeing fellow citizens, party affiliation is not one of them. I would vote for a Democrat in a second if I thought that Democrat believed in what I did. (Not likely, but not the point.) But these radio personalities- who reflect a good portion of Americans and how they think- can't get past the smoke and mirrors.

Am I so crazy to think that party affiliation does no matter? That the candidate ought to be measured on who he is?! Is that so insane? What if King George declared himself a Democrat for the last year of his term? Would that mean that a Democrat should not win the next election now? What if he had declared Democrat for his entire second term? First a Republican for four years, then a Democrat for four years. Would that matter? The conservatives that love Reagan (almost all conservatives do) don't care that he was a Democrat when governing California, then changed when president. I'd hope (and probably be wrong) that they wouldn't care if he was a Democrat president if he had acted the exact same. I can tell you I wouldn't care, though. So what if King George had always been a Democrat? Now all of a sudden a Republican should win, since in this scenario a Democrat screwed things up? The letter in front of his name be damned, R or D, HE'S STILL THE SAME GUY!!! And the two candidates are not him! Just imagine, the greatest president of all time could come along and not be elected because the wrong guy with the wrong letter in front of his name came before him. You know what? I have said this before: George Washington himself warned us, in his farewell address, that the "spirit of party," meaning political parties, would easily be our country's undoing if given the chance.

But I guess people can't see that. Most Americans have never even heard those wise words from our nation's father. When is the last time that was taught in a high school history class, I wonder? No, the people today, they only see in blue and red. The patriotic wool pulled over their eyes. Kind of like the black and white TVs of old, only even those had shades of gray, for God's sake. Nope, right now the presidency is red, and is bad, so next it should be blue! Now if that blue works out good, we ought to keep it for a while, but if the blue ends up bad too, we can try red again. Are you seeing this?

And let us try to follow the card, just follow the card, pick a color, follow the card. Aaand we have the blue over here, now its the red, lets do the red again, but here its the blue, follow the blue, follow the blue, and hey, it was actually red, did you know? But here's the blue, here's the blue, there's the red, follow the blue, now the red... With all this watching back and forth, America has been suckered into trying to keep track of the red card and the blue card, when they are both the same thing! It's either two red cards or two blue, pick one. But don't think they're any different.

In the meantime, the country has been hustled right from under your nose. The two thugs- one big fat stinking elephant and one ludicrous jackass- just walked off with your freedom. Wake up, people! The D.C. mafia's slight of hand lies in the party system the have set up! There is no difference between the parties any more, not really, can you not see? Stop playing Two Card Monte and start looking for, no- DEMANDING, a real candidate. Not just a change in party.

Out Doing Disenfranchisement 2

Well, the news just came in. It's so pathetic, I have moved beyond outrage. I just laughed. There comes a point when you just find amusement at it all. (After that comes more outrage, then desperation, then re-education camps.) A "compromise" has been reached- FL gets to seat it's delegates, but they only get half a vote each. So there you go FL Democrat voters! Your voice is officially half as important as the voice of Democrat voters from other states.

But hey, on the bright side, actually, no Democrats have voices that matter in this tight race. Because it's a tight race! Remember? Super delegates? The party will decide for you anyway. So stop worrying about it. I've always said liberals only believe in freedom when you happen to agree with them. Now you know how I felt after McCain stole the Republican primary from the party members, right before I changed my party affiliation to "independent," since there was no reason left to stay affiliated with those losers. So don't feel bad, FL Democrats! I feel your pain. And it isn't that your voice isn't important to your party... it's that no one's voice is important to your party!

Prediction Followup

Tuesday, April 4, 2008. I made a prediction. Scroll down far enough, and you can read it. I predicted that the 8 would-be 9/11 repeaters, the liquid explosive terrorists, who were going on trial, would be largely if not completely ignored by the media. You forgot about them didn't you? Well, was I right? Have you heard a thing about it?

Out Doing Disenfanchisement

Boy, I tell you, the Democrats just hate to be outdone. Not that I don't hate the Republicans these days, but at least their name isn't so hypocritical. A Republic is a state ruled by many. A Democracy is a state in which votes are used to decide things. (We are a Democratic Republic- at least in theory these days- because we vote- that's the democracy part- to decide our leaders- that's the republic part.) As corrupt and vile as they are, Republicans do, still, support a republican system. But what about the Democrats?

Well, it is no secret that Republican Juan McCain has stolen his own party's nomination. He was not the favorite, he was not wanted, really, and he was not most people's first, or even second choice. Everyone knows that Romney was the party's first choice, and surprise, surprise, he was the most qualified, and about the most conservative of the bunch. I guess the Democrats saw this just as the Republicans did, and they weren't to be outdone! I am sure you have heard about this whole Florida thing, do the votes count, were they taken too early, etc? The votes, which it seem would help Hillary Rotten, are being called on by Barry Hussein to be only half counted. You see, because it doesn't help his campaign, their votes don't matter to him. Just like the Republican party's desire to not have McCain on the ticket, the entire vote of everyone in Florida doesn't matter to this so-called "Democrat." You know he would be calling for their votes to count if they would help him, and Hill-Bill would be calling for them not to if they wouldn't help her. It's revolting. Are we even in America anymore?

We see this everywhere now. Need I mention the millions of votes that were brushed aside by one activist judge in Commie-fornia on the banning "gay marriage," whatever that even means, vote? I could give you a whole history lesson about the radical Democrat from the past named McGovern, but let's just cut to the chase. Super delegates. Basically, the entire, the ENTIRE vote of the Democrats doesn't count anyway if it's close- which it is. Forget about throwing the Florida Democrat's vote out, let's throw out the vote of every Democrat in the primary. And they complained about Bush "stealing" the election? Now they take up the opposite position, in the same state- Florida- just because their new Messiah wonder-boy who happens to be a black guy with Islamic heritage, go figure, didn't do well there.

And you mean to tell me that these people are Democratic? You mean to me that they care about the vote- the will of the people- at all? You mean to tell me these people aren't fascist, communistic agenda driven liars, who hate and despise and look down upon the common citizen? Well let me fire one back at you. I despise, hate, and look down on anyone stupid enough to like, admire, or vote for Obama. How do you like that? Oh, now I'm the Nazi bad guy, is that it? Go ahead, call your names. No, I'm a lover of America and freedom. That man and his people and string-pullers hate America, hate my freedom, and hate me. So screw you all if you don't like it! I don't really care. This is still America, I think, and I'm allowed to hate whoever I want.

One thing I wouldn't do, though, is deny the freedom of speech, or of opinion, to anyone dumb enough to support him, or anyone else. They are guaranteed that right, you know. And I surely, SURELY wouldn't deny them their vote. That's the difference between me and them. Between me, the American, and the traitors, wrapped in the American flag, plotting its demise. Between the person who admires the founders and loves the constitution, and those who don't even know who the founders were, and would wipe their butts with the shredded constitution they know nothing about. That this whole mess is even a news story at all makes me sick. It's disgusting. It's revolting. It's vile.

If you people out there think we really live in a free society, a democratic republic, think again. That mountain is eroding, and it is eroding fast. The fascists who would rule you all with an iron fist ala Hitler and Stalin themselves are on the march- on both sides of the aisle. I strongly suggest you all go out and buy an "assault" rifle with a lot of spare magazines and ammo, just in case. Come January or so, you might not be able to anymore. Even our conservative candidate Romney agreed with the unconstitutional "assault" weapons ban. Even King George, the guy we thought was on our side with the whole second amendment thing, who let the "assault" weapons ban expire, has now banned the import of foreign made (meaning the good ones) AK-47 clone rifles and rifle kits. It's just one more of the many steps taken to move against the second amendment.

It's after that, if you study history, that you just might find the Gestapo, who were once called the brown shirts- but this time I bet will be called the green shirts, in the name of saving the world from global warming, taking control. Or it will be Child Protective Services kicking down your door in the middle of the night as if you were a common drug dealing thug. I'm telling you, I'm telling you, I'M TELLING YOU: they are assaulting the freedom of speech (see Stalin's invention: political correctness), and the right to bear arms, because they are slowly taking away your freedom. After those first two amendments are in the trash, everything falls. Those two important freedoms: to voice your opinion, and to arm yourself, are the only things that maintain your freedom. Don't you understand? What do you think you can do after they take your right to speak out against them, and then take your weapons with which you would fight them. Vote them out of office?!? WE CAN'T EVEN DO THAT NOW!!!

You know that most of those people in TX, who broke no laws, whose children were stolen from them, who already won their court battle in the name of the constitution- days ago- STILL have yet to get their kids back, don't you?

Go ahead, make the naked Marxist, Barry Hussein, our next president- the next king, inheriting King George's throne. See what he does with the position. Or let McCain steal your party's nomination, it isn't like it matters what the voters want, is it? Or let's just Hillary go on and get the nomination despite her losing the popular vote. It's scarey, I almost break out in a cold sweat to think about it, but Hill-Bill is actually rates the lowest in election stealing at this point. Not that she wouldn't in a second, don't get me wrong. I'd worry for Barry's life if he got the nomination, especially if he were dumb enough to put her on the ticket as VP. (Won't happen). But my GOD! Think about it! Even if it's just coincidence of circumstance, Hillary Rotten is following the rules, and trying to get everyone's vote to count, more than the other two candidates. Don't miss the irony, though, she'd steal your vote in a second to advance her cause. Did you know that her "husband" passed more legsilation through executive order than any other president ever? He was as bad as King George! Yea, those two care about the will of the people. Even still, it is as scarey as cancer that she is currently acting most in accord with the principles of democracy.

It sill boils down to this though: all three choices are illegitimate. It's amazing, but somehow, we have resulted with three front runners- and ALL of them are trying to steal elections and make the peoples' votes meaningless. The majority of the nation doesn't want any of these clowns. But then, what do you care? Go on, keep refusing to give a damn about your vote meaning absolutely nothing. Shrug it all off, live in decadence. Wear a "life is good" t-shirt and go golfing or something. Who cares if the Bill of Rights is being copied over with Marx's and Engel's manifesto? Yesterday it was some peaceful, law abiding "extremists" living isolated on a ranch/compound that were stripped of their constitutional rights. Tomorrow, I promise, if we stay on this road, it will be you.

Mob Rule in Washington

Exactly thirty years and one week ago, a mob boss named Joe Colombo was gunned down in public and died shortly thereafter. The story is that this mob boss was bringing too much attention to himself by being so vocal in the organization he created: the Italian-American Civil Rights League. The league fought against the mobster/criminal stereotype, etc. So, he could not keep a low profile, and the other head of the other four families decided that he had to go.

I have, however, come across a different opinion. Supposedly given from a freelance hit man of that era, who supposedly had the inside scoop, it appears that the other mob bosses (Carlo Gambino in particular- the real Godfather), were upset with Joe not because of the attention he supposedly brought to himself and mafia activities... but because of the money he was making. Despite the five families being independent (more or less), when a big enough racket came around, they tended to want to share. If one family didn't, or didn't help out, just like in the movie the Godfather, the other families get really mad, and go to war.

Another instance of similar circumstances comes to mind: the assassination of Carmine Galante. I have a picture of his fresh corpse in the book "Donne Brasco," you can google it. His cigar is still in his mouth. The leader of the Bonanno family until he was killed-by his own bodyguards- was killed for one very important reason: not sharing. It's like they never learned the lesson as kids, and the stakes get higher when they grow up. Carmine Galante was a major importer of heroin, and made a ridiculous amount of money off the enterprise. And he didn't share with the other families. So he had to go.

Let us move from New York to Washington. A different breed of mafia runs that place, mostly not Italian, still mostly a bunch of greedy, corrupt, thieving murdering (in one way or another) criminals. The difference? Less thugs, more briefcases. Less bones being made, more law degrees being "earned." Less Mulberry Street, more Wall Street. Even still, you share the spoils, or you come under fire.

It has been more than a year since the Democrats took the majority of both houses of Congress from the Republicans. Before that election they promised we'd be out of Iraq in 90 days, I think it was. 90 days goes by, nothing happens, they claim that rascally ol' dubbya' is preventing them from getting the troops out. (Notice that Bush is always an idiot except in this one case, where he out manuevers them every time, and of course when he agrees with them on lunacy like global warming...) So then the say, well, give us six months. Or whatever. And now, what do you hear about it? What do you hear from the Democrats about getting out of Iraq? Oh, well, you have to elect Hussein Obama to get them out is the recent idea, but that's about it. And before this presidential race started really getting into gear, you heard nothing from them. NOTHING!

But what you did see, if you were looking, was massive, MASSIVE amounts of pork barrel projects suddenly going towards the Democrats. The top ten recipients of pork lately have almost all been Democrats. So, before the Republicans were raping the treasury and spending like drunken sailors on shore leave, and the Democrats had been mostly squeezed out of the action. So, just like their mafia counterparts, they went after the money, meaning the people keeping all the money for themselves, got rid of them, and now that they have it, and they're content. Well, not content, but less unhappy. Talk about a shell game! It's red, it's blue, who will take your money next? And that's all what it comes down to.

Now tell me, honestly, is there really much difference between the Republicans and the Democrats? When you follow the money, is there any difference at all? Any more difference than between the Gambino family or the Bonanno family?

For that matter, is there much difference between Washington politicians and New York mafiosi? Because I can't find much.

Waco's Sequel 3

Well, it seems now that 126 children are being returned to their parents. I'd say "good," except that it isn't good, because it never should have happened to begin with.

One thing the news reports have yet to answer for me: over 400 kids were taken by the CPS Nazis- WHERE ARE THEY?!

Ted Kennedy

So yea, he had a siezure, he's got a brain tumor, looks like he's going to die. People are holding him up as some sort of saint, which is such a greivous thing to do, I'm not even going there. Some people say we need not to do that, but I still wish him no harm, and that's fine.

Personally, I have so little respect for the man, not because of his political beliefs, but just because of his character... that I have a difference response all together.

I have decided to name his tumor Mary Jo Kopechne. That's right, Mary Jo. Why would I do such a thing?

Mary Jo is the woman he left for dead after wrecking his car in a large body of water.

Hillary, a Communist Indeed

So I hear this sound bite today... really lets you know what the liberal Democrats are all about in the year 2008. Hillary says, "...I see these oil companies making record profits... I want to take those profits and put them in an alternative energy fund..."

Well, for the nineteenth, NINETEENTH! (not a typo!) time, big oil has been hauled up in front of congress. And for the nineteenth time, there has been no evidence whatsoever to prove a shred of any sort of price gouging.

But the real story, that the media misses, is the first half of what Hill said. Did you notice it too? She said, about oil companys' profts... "I want to take those profits..." Is that not communism? Is that not totalitarianism? Is that not an affront to the free market, and freedom all together?

Gee, Hill, who else's money do you want to take?

Waco's Sequel 2

Well, the judge hearing the court case (in which children were taken from their parents AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION) threw it out. That judge knew it was bogus just like I did, so that's justice right?

Oh sure, yea, that's justice. A seizure of not only private property, but parents' own children, with no justification whatsoever, besides a prank phone call originating in a state that doesn't even border with the state it happened, with no right... that's justice. After all, the conclusion of the whole ordeal is that the kids will supposedly be reunited with their family. It isn't like the kids will be traumatized. It isn't like the Nazis in CPS overstepped their bounds and got away with it. No, no... we still live in a free country. Sure we do.

I'd like to take this moment to thank Michael Savage for preaching the truth on the matter from day one, the only personality to do so that I am aware of. I'd also like to thank the one sane judge left in America who threw this case out.

For that matter, I'd also like to thank Rush Limbaugh for having, well, seemingly nothing to say about the matter whatsoever. I'd like to thank Sean Hannity for continuing the obsess about the so-called "election." I'd like to thank Bill O'Reily for immediately hanging these victims of an overzealous government- a group of NAZIS or Joseph Stalin wannabes- as sexual perverts and rapists and so on, with no evidence of the claims he made. (You stinking rat, you.) In fact, I'd like to thank the former Soviet Union for teaching the world by example how to abuse power to the extent that they did in modern times. Thank you all for standing up for the little guy, for Americans' rights- like Habeas Corpus.

For that matter, I'd like to thank the average citizen for not caring at all about this news story, even when it could very well be your kids next. "When they came for the communists, I said nothing..." We all know the quote. "When they came for me, there was nobody left..." Yes, thank you to everyone for turning a blind eye because you disapprove of the weird-dress-wearing polygamist "nut jobs." Look at the Rainbow Mafia and how they operate, getting votes overturned through activist judges (like in commie-fornia, surprise, surprise), and you think you, the heterosexual, might not be next?

I'd also like to thank all the liberals who think it was a good thing because, deep down, they hate any form of Christianity, or even anyone claiming to be Christian. Or religious at all, if the religion originates from white people. Thank you all for hating one particular religion so much that it blinds your judgement as to what is really going on.

And finally, I'd like to thank the FBI, the Senate committee that doesn't exist to investigate this matter, the entire government complex at large, for doing nothing about this blatant abuse of power that it should never have to begin with. Thank you all for not bringing to justice the Gulag-runners that took these children from their parents illegally. Thank you for bringing us one step closer to totalitarianism through your inaction, meaning your silent support of this criminality.

Thank you everyone who didn't get as incredibly upset as me about this, which is the only reason those Nazis in CPS are getting away with this, and undoubtedly will do it again. Thank you, thank you everyone, working, be it through action or inaction, to take away such a fundamental freedom as the right of someone not breaking the law to keep their kids.

You all make me sick.

The Heat!

Oh my God! It is so hot outside today! It's in the 90s! What's going on? Global warming, global warming! It must be global warming! Surely the oceans will be rising. Hurricanes! Tornados! Massive heatwaves are arriving and senior citizens will suffer strokes, heart attacks, and death! Won't someone do something about this sweltering, unbearable, warm...

Oh wait. Nevermind, it's just summer.

A Response to CFWB

The question was asked:

So why are we fed all these grand ideas about how recycling will save the world? Turning old paper into new paper makes more pollution than killing trees? Trees take a while to grow back. And where are they farmed? And why does farming trees make it all better?

in the comment section of a previous post called "Chinese Funded Welfare Bribe." It's a good enough question to answer in a post, so here goes.

We are fed all these grand ideas about recycling, as well as the multitude of lies about why we need to for the sake of our environment, because the string-pullers gain power by doing so.It's about control. Think about it. Every time congress passes a law, the government's power grows. More laws to enforce means more money going to them means less money we have, less personal freedoms we have... they take from us every time they do these things. It's good to outlaw insurance fraud scams and murder and all that, but that should be the end of it. If you sing and dance and convince people of a lie like recycling, that isn't the end. It's the beginning. First we are wasting time and energy to create an entire unnecessary industry (follow the money, the golden rule of unraveling politics), and before you know it we have an entire nation hoodwinked into thinking that man made global warming is real.

I mean, really, think about it. What more evidence do you need that this lie is one giant hoax than the fact that the biggest guy pushing it... once claimed to have invented the INTERNET!!! He didn't, you know. He did, however, inherit his fortune- with which he flies around everywhere in private jets, huge "pollution" there, and owns a mansion that uses more "dirty" energy in a month than my upscale neighborhood cul-de-sac uses in half a year- from his daddy, who was a big-time coal baron. I am curious, did Al Gore ever plant any trees from his vast, inherited, coal-fortune to help "offset" all that carbon that his family helped put in the air? I doubt it. But he did make a cool million from that peace prize he won for his work about global warming... figure that one out.

Hey, I have an idea. Pop quiz for Al Moss-Beard! Three questions: Why is the sky blue? Why does the planet have four seasons? What has caused global cooling in the past, before humans were around?

Think he'd pass?

Why am I the only one asking these questions about Mr. Gore, by the way? Why isn't anyone on CNN or Fox News? Probably because the so-called environmentalists have so brainwashed the masses- starting with recycling!- that we just take this environmentalist crap as gospel whenever we hear it. Humans bad, destroying planet, I believe, no need to question, yea... Aaaanyway.

If you put a frog in water in a pot, room temperature, then turn on the stove and bring the water to a slow boil, that frog will not realize what has happened. He will stay and be boiled to death. The exact same is true with people losing their freedoms, and we are losing them. We have been for longer than I have been alive. It starts with something like a lie about how we're supposedly running out of landfill space, then we're all recycling, then it grows to global warming, the biggest joke of science EVER, and before you know it... legislators in Commie-fornia are actually proposing to give the state control of every house's thermostat. Yes, that really did happen. Did you read about it? Under that proposed law, you would no longer have the power to set your thermostat as you please, the local government could control it via remote control for you. Is that not a loss of freedom?

I sure hope you don't have a kid who has asthma and a cold. Oh, I'm sure there would be a exception-requisition form to apply for, with a little box to fill out where you could explain that little Johnny just isn't going to do well in a house that is only sixty-eight degrees, you could attach a doctor's note (hope there isn't socialized medicine at this point!) and maybe they'd eventually let you move it up to seventy-two degrees. But how much time do you think that giant mess of red tape would take? You know the local government runs the DMV right? Have you ever heard a Commie-fornian say anything positive about their DMV? Have you ever heard anyone?

All the above is still to mention the government's power growing the more people believe in that crap. You know the solution the Democrats have for global warming? Fines! Taxes! Fees! It's all they know, so they figure, hey, we'll just fine companies for polluting. Oh, sure, that will work. It isn't like the companies will pass on these new expenses to the consumer- YOU- and make your life harder because you have to pay more for the same product. And surely companies will somehow magically stop polluting because they're being taxed, right? Well.. no, no, no... I don't think so. I know one thing that will happen though: more money will suddenly be going to congress via taxes. That means that we have less money/freedom, and they get more money/power, right? Can I please stop beating this dead horse now?

No? Well then let me point out that every mentally retarded European nation that has signed on to the Kyoto accords has failed to reduce their "carbon footprint," since it's impossible to do so and stay afloat economically, and always just end up paying fines to the UN. That comes from their citizens' taxes, you know.

Moving on, the next thing you know, Miranda rights are right out the window, and the government now has the unfettered "right" to send their goons into our houses any time they wish, on a whim, with no repercussions for having no good reason to afterwards. They'll start small scale, maybe just raiding the guy who turns his heat up to ninety degrees, how dare he? In fact, things like that are already happening- WACO anyone? Or WACO pt. 2? Think it can't happen? IT ALREADY IS!

Fifty years ago it would have been ludicrously laughable that anyone, ANYONE would propose that the state control our household thermostats via remote control. Can you imagine anyone in a suit and hat like they wore in the late fifties, sipping his martini, proposing that thermostat law with a straight face? Such an idea would have made even Michael Corleone crack a smile. Yet, here we are. The question you're not asking that you should is: what will things be like fifty years from now?

You know... Hitler didn't throw the Jews and Christians in the camps the first day he took office. He sneaked it up on people over time, like the boiling frog. Only he didn't boil anyone, he baked them in an oven. I'm sure, at the time of his election, though, most Germans thought it could never happen to them.

I repeat: it all starts small: hey, let's recycle, it's good for the planet! The seed is planted, watered, and the lie grows. It ends with you and your children in a "re-education" camp if you don't pull that weed out by the roots. That's why I do what I do.



To address the rest of the question, people say that we "save trees" when we recycle paper as if we were going to run out. That's like saying we will run out of cows because I eat steak. Bzzzt! Wrong! I'm sorry, but thanks for playing. Cows grow back, and so do trees. The time it takes is irrelevant, because these giant tree farms (a big one is located in WA state, just so you know), go by plots. So! By the time the tree cutters have farmed the last plot, the first plot they cut, and replanted, is full of trees that are fully grown again. And by the time they finish with that plot, the second will be ready (if it isn't already), and so forth. The importance of our ability to farm trees means that we will not run out of them, despite the lies you hear. Am I moving too fast for you? Hopefully not, because I also must mention that, yes, recycling paper is an industrial process. A difficult one. Industrial processes "pollute." So there you go, tree-hugger. Sorry to burst your bubble. I should also mention that these tree farms would be devoid of trees all together had we not decided to farm any. That's right! That means that, because we eventually cut these trees down for paper and such, there are actually MORE trees in the world!

I won't get into the fact that trees produce a small amount of the world's oxygen, and that something around 80% is produced by... oh wait! I'm not telling!

DO NOT BUY THE LIES THEY TELL TO STEAL YOUR FREEDOM!

Liberals in Real Life 4

I just got off the phone with someone who is an elementary school teacher. It was so... profound, a conversation, that I felt the need to immediately chronicle it here. I'm not going to say who it was that called me, but she was with about ten of her colleagues- yes, all teachers. They all did not know the answer to a question, I don't know how it came up, so I was called, and I gave the answer. The question was: did the USA fight in WWI? Seriously. None of them knew. Not a one. As the conversation moved on for a few minutes, it turns out that they didn't know what happened in Korea, or how that turned out, exactly, and the fact that we had basically won in Vietnam (before we wimped out and left- I won't tell the entire story right now), and so on. These teachers had no idea about any of this stuff. History repeats itself because people don't learn from it, right? Well...

I should also mention that everyone in this historically-ignorant group is either a Hillary Rotten Clinton or Barry Hussein supporter.

Surprised?

Chinese Funded Welfare Bribe pt. 2

So. While my Chinese-Funded-Welfare-Bribe, CFWB for short, was already deposited in my bank account, I just received a letter about it in the mail explaining what it is, how it should already be there, etc. Good to know the government is spending even more of my money on all these letters. I noticed, though, on the envelope, it says that it (meaning the envelope and the letter) was printed on recycled paper. You know, the type of paper that is more expensive (in dollars and pollution) to produce- more of my money down the toilet- and just so happens to have almost a null effect on trees, which grow back (we farm them!), since 95% of recycled paper is made of- you guessed it- brand new tree pulp. The CFWB wasn't insulting enough, I guess, so the information all about my CFWB is printed on environmentally-unfriendly paper.

Gee, isn't that nice?

The Chinese Communist Welfare Invasion of Bribery

Well, I just noticed that my bank account has received my Chinese-funded (yea, we borrowed it from THEM!) welfare check, a.k.a. BRIBERY check (it's an election year) that our liar-politicians are dubbing "economic stimulus," the most ridiculous thing to be uttered since Al Gore told us about the 23 ft rise in sea levels thanks to my SUV. You know what I'm going to do? NOT SPEND IT! I don't like welfare. I'm going to put it in my kids' savings accounts, because they are the ones who will end up paying for this embarrassment of a shenanigan. In any real country, everyone who orchestrated this would be thrown out of office and maybe even thrown in jail, I swear, it's bordering on treason.

Anyway, I encourage all of you to do the same. A measly fraction of one percent of the GDP is not going to stimulate a thing, anyone who knows anything knows that. Save it, invest it in gold or something... because you are going to pay it back and then some, and them some more. It's called taxes, and you will be paying them. And you'll pay a lot more than whatever you got in your bribery welfare check, I promise you that.

Liberals in Real Life 3

Some people do get it. Despite all the brainwashing. The gun shop owner who sold a Glock Seung-Hui Cho, the insane kid who shot up the Virginia Tech school, is making ammends in his own way. No, he isn't closing down his shop. He isn't joining the Brady campaign. He isn't doing anything stupid to worsen the situation. He is offering to sell a firearm to any Virginia Tech student at a large discount. So large a discount, in fact, that he loses money on the transaction. To him, it is worth it, because the students, usually on a very fixed budget, would be otherwise incapable of acquiring a weapon with which to defend themselves (on campus). After all, this lunatic Cho was bent on a massacre, it is a safe bet that he would have perpetrated it whether it was easy to get a gun or not. However, if, say, just a quarter of the students there were packing, and had any idea at all how to use a gun, he would not have killed so many people. Maybe none at all.

Still, a spokes-moron named Larry Hincker, the Associate VP for University Relations, had this to say:

"[the offer is] incredibly insensitive to the families of the victims who lost loved ones, and to the injured students still recovering from this horrendous tragedy..."

Clearly, some people are just beyond help.

Coming Together?

You know what I am absolutely SICK of hearing? People telling me that we all need to "come together" to solve something as stupid as, say, "climate change." Are you kidding me? I suppose it is not about the fact that global warming is a giant hoax that makes me embarrassed of the lack of simple knowledge among my fellow citizens, at least it will get us all to come together? Well that's something, isn't it? Our country is so divided, we need to all come together for something...

Well you know what? The Italian peninsula was not united since the fall of Rome in the 400s until the early 1900s under Benito Mussolini. Mussolini's fascist government really brought people together! Like they hadn't been in a thousand and a half years. Finally, the Italian people were brought together! United! They were one nation again!

Ask anyone still alive from that era if it was worth it.

How Liberals Make Things Worse 2- Earth Day Edition

It is no big secret that liberals are madly in love with the concept of anthropogenic global warming. (That means “caused by man.”) So sure are they that mankind will destroy the Earth’s environment so much that not only we, but most all of life as the globe knows it, will die off. Hurricanes! Rising sea levels! Ice bergs! Tornados! Malaria! Drought! Starvation! War! The list goes on.

To help avoid this series of catastrophes that will surely result in Ragnarok, the liberals endorse ideas like ethanol and hybrid cars! These, you see, will result in less carbon dioxide being put into the atmosphere. If only carbon dioxide had anything to do with the mild, miiiild global warming we are (possibly were) experiencing… but that is a different subject. The point is: ethanol and hybrid cars will help us “pollute” less. Right?

WRONG!!! As it turns out, the pollution created from producing the corn (or whatever else you decide to use, maybe sugar cane) that is used to create ethanol greatly exceeds the amount of pollution you would use from good ol’ gasoline, or “gasolina,” as the liberals would have us pronounce it. This is all not to mention the sharp rise in food prices this causes that helps further starve the third world. So much for cutting carbon emissions.

But wait, it gets better. A study was done- a legitimate one- and it has been determined that hybrids pollute more than even a Hummer H3. You read that right- get this. The industrial production involved with a hybrid’s rechargeable batter is so high in pollution, that to produce a Hybrid and drive it for an average vehicle lifespan would put more of that evil carbon dioxide into the air than to produce and drive a Hummer. Seriously. This is not a joke. Now, don’t get me wrong, a little more CO2 overall is fine with me- plants breathe that stuff. It’s good for them. It helps them grow. But the average liberal (meaning the useful idiots that the Democrats/communists use to further their agenda) is trying ever so desperately to get less CO2 in the air, and here they are, yet again, screwing it up, by putting more in it instead. Shocking.

So there you have it. Once again, the liberals have set out with a goal and moved in the opposite direction. I don’t believe one wink in man made global warming, but I don’t like (concentrated) pollution any more than anyone else. I hate smog. Liberals hate it not so much for good reasons, but stupid ones. In their effort to fix it, they make it worse. Lucky for them, liberals give each other credit for trying, not succeeding. Failing with good intentions is better than doing anything right in their book. Is it any wonder hippies never have jobs? Anyway, I think we all see where this is going… Regarding pollution and CO2 output, “saving the world,” this is just one more example of How Liberals Make Things Worse.

How Liberals Make Thing Worse

There is a series called “Gangland” on the History Channel that airs every Thursday night. I wish every American would watch this show, especially the episode covering MS-13. Perhaps then the sleeping dragon would wake up long enough to eject these vermin trash from our country. Anyway, the episode last night was about a gang known as the Texas Syndicate. Though they originated in California, their numbers and power grew in Texas- and in the prison system of that state is where they really became what they were.

The story of their rise to “greatness” contains a lesson clearly lost on everyone on the left side of the aisle. Most self-identified “Republican” politicians too. During the 70s, the Texas penal system was not easy on inmates. The inmates were forced to work on chain gangs- that’s where there are five or so prisoners chained together so none can run off, and they dig ditches or something. Guards stand nearby with shotguns, just incase someone tries something stupid. In the prison facility, the hardened prisoners, most of whom were convicted of crimes such as rape or murder- and those who weren’t still had probably committed such crimes- knew that if they stepped out of line, they would get a beat-down from the guards. Yes, a beat-down. The animals known as inmates were kept in line like animals; they were treated with respect IF they showed it first. The vast majority of the time, their lesson didn’t have to be learned the hard way. When they did, it usually took only once.

Then, in the very early 80s, a perverted concept of civil rights showed up. This is when the Texas Syndicate found it possible to grow in numbers and power. I can only assume that the ACLU was behind all this- it’s a good bet- and all of a sudden, chain gangs were not allowed. Cruel and unusual, apparently, was it to force murderers to labor while the tax payers fund their room and board. Of course, you can forget about physical punishment of inmates who needed it. Give them cable TV, HBO- yard time with a full set of weights with which to work out- to fill that void. The ever so liberal idea was that these new policies would make the prison system more humane to the inmates.

Well, before I get to the ironic (and moronic) part, let me first tell you that this new, lax environment is what allowed the prisoners to truly act out their animal instincts. They got in the now outnumbered guards’ faces, threatened to rape and kill them and their families, and often attempted- and undoubtedly occasionally succeeded- in attacking the guards. I know the liberals have no care for prison guards, or “the man,” as they probably regard them, but I still think this occurrence is important to understand. It was this chaotic, violent environment that enabled the Texas Syndicate to take form.

Now, the real irony is that the humaneness of the prisoners’ lives fell dramatically. It plummeted. Because the guards could no longer punish a prisoner for acting out occasionally, they all acted out. Mostly on each other. Lines were drawn on racial and ethnic backgrounds, gangs formed, and inmate-on-inmate violence soared. Beatings, stabbings, gang rapes, all were commonplace now. These new, “humane” policies not only resulted in the formation of terrible, subhuman gangs… they resulted in the worse imaginable environment for the inmates as well.

I hope you’re thinking what I’m thinking: how retarded.

Here’s the trick. Now that these prisoners have all these “rights” (“inmate rights” is a concept almost laughable, if you ask me) to carry out their animal-like behavior, no one will take them away. No one will even try to go back to the good days of chain gangs, in which guards were free to whip the inmates into line. When the prisoners had to earn their keep, and actually pay their debt to society through work rather than sitting around. The ACLU would surely defend these animals’ rights still, despite the slew of supposedly unintended consequences that make life worse for everyone. And I mean everyone. The inmates, the guards, and the citizens outside. The sheer insanity of it all is enough to make you dizzy.

This, my readers, is what liberals do. They come in with ideas, theories, stuff that sounds good- to some people- on paper… and it fails in practice. God forbid we stick to something that we evolved over hundreds if not thousands of years and has shown to work wherever tried. A prison system that treats prisoners like prisoners!? No, no… let’s try it the way that has always failed. You know, the way that didn’t work last time, or the time before, and, going back to ancient times, still didn’t work. It’s the humane thing to do, after all. If you ask me, sometimes a little ruthlessness is the most humane policy. Sun Tzu would agree with me. When you think about it, it really is no wonder that liberals STILL think communism can work.

Let us face the facts. Violent offenders are despicable scum, their actions have shown that. It is an insult to the rest of us to even call them human. Actually, considering how animals treat each other, it is an insult to call them animals, too. No cruel and unusual punishment? Fine, that is a good policy. We will not torture our citizens (the constitution only applies to American citizens and foreigners in our borders legally, by the way), we will not be overly cruel, no mutilating and such… and this is a good thing. The founding fathers knew this. They did not want the government to abuse its power. I have no objections with that.

However, the founders would also have approved of the Texas penal system in the 70s, and I guarantee you they would scold everyone for letting it turn to what we have today. They taught us that the government exists to protect the people- and that is what the old Texas system did, and it was within the bounds of the Constitution. These animals need to be locked away and kept in line- and prevented from forming dangerous organizations that flood our country with violence, intimidation, and drugs. The only logical solution is to run our maximum security prisons like Texas did in the 70s, nation wide. They worked. And, maybe execute some of the worst offenders, but that is a different debate.

Logic be damned, the ACLU will have us treating these prisoners better than outsiders until Americans get organized enough to stand up to liberals like ACLU lawyers and take their power away. Some day, I hope, the ACLU will be seen as the anti-American organization that it is and be disbanded due to lack of funding and interest. Maybe they can even be sued, or even prosecuted for aiding and abetting the enemy- like Islamist terrorists. Don’t think that they haven’t.

It all starts at the water cooler. Letters to the editor. Around the dinner table. Even in the college classroom, impossible as that seems today. And, of course, in posts like this that I hope enough people will read and pass on. Not for fame, just to get the message out. It is long past time to take our country back. I want everyone to know this story and its lesson. Because this is just one of countless examples of: How Liberals Make Things Worse.

Waco's Sequel

Well, at least no one was killed this time.

You know what? I don't have a lot of time to write this, so it'll be quick. We are now living in a time, it has been confirmed with this "polygamist" (allegedly) sect, that the federal government can take your children away whenever they want. All a place in Texas needs is a fake phone call from Colorado. No due process. No reason worth a warrant. One prank phone call from my neighbor, and, apparently, the FASCISTS at CPS (child "protective" services) can take my kids away from me via a small, armed, police/military-like operation. We have no freedom anymore. They have it, they just don't flex their muscle all that much... yet.

I wrote "protective" in quotes, by the way, because I assure you- I promise- that those kids who get taken away will be worse off for it. You know, I thought we lived in a country where you raised your kids according to your own values (only restrictions like not making them criminals used to apply). Now, apparently, if you don't like a very religious group of people, you can move in and remove them, and put them in a foster home. How many of these kids who were removed- and I bet you they won't be given back to their parents- are going to end up in porno, or on drugs, or what have you? That's not in accordance with anyone's values except the liberal fascists in CPS, those short haired, fat, lesbian types. The whole thing disgusts me more than I can describe.

And you know what? The press is just part of the same government-media complex that has taken our freedom. From Fox News to CNN, everyone hangs these people out as guilty before a shred of evidence has shown up.

One prank phone call.

And your kids are taken from you by force.

You know what msnbc.com has to say about the whole story, AFTER it came out that the phone call was fake? After it was confirmed that the government has taken children on the basis of nothing from their parents? After we have all the evidence we need to know that the government has, de facto, our freedom in its pocket. The headline read "why do the polygamists dress like that?" Because they wear old style clothes. Yea, because that's the important thing here.

Did You Know? (Infiltration)

This post is for anyone who still denies that Islamist groups are trying to infiltrate our culture and help wage jihad on America via means other than violence. (Violence is still their ultimate goal, of course. They merely mean to soften us up.)

Okay, so maybe you have a learning disability, and you do not understand what the organization CAIR is. You don't get it when you hear that they denied or doubted Osama's involvement in 9/11 even after he took credit for it. You don't get it when they sue or attack anyone and everyone they possibly can under false accusations, including but not limited to Paul Harvey (of all people!?) and Michael Savage, who is currently suing them for slander and copyright abuse, I believe- and has a really good case. You don't even get it that they help fund terrorism and were unindicted co-conspirators in a Federal terrorism trial.

Maybe you also don't understand the significance of the "Flying Imams," and what they were trying to do. Maybe you don't get it that they were acting way too Islamic on a plane, fully intent on getting themselves kicked off, just so they could sue later and soften up security as well as good citizens who don't like it when people chant "Allah, Allah, Allah" then ask for seat belt extensions when they don't need them.

But this- this should really help you understand. A memorial has been in the works in the PA field that flight 93 went down. The passengers tried to take the plane back, and the hijackers crashed it before they could. Another attack on either the Capitol Building, or the White House, probably, was averted. Now the memorial suddenly contains numerous Islamic symbols, including its very shape: a giant crecent.

A petition is circling to fix this insult.

Do you see now, how they fight this war? It isn't just in Iraq. It isn't just terrorist attacks. It is by any and every means at their disposal. It is just as much a PR war, to soften up our attitudes towards extremist Islam, as it is anything else.

You know what? Don't let the PC police get you. It's okay to feel anger at some guy in a turban with a giant bushy unkempt beard. It's okay to get mad when your child's high school has "Islam Day" where they have to learn all about Muslims, but without the violence that pervades almost every part of the world you find that religion. It's okay to not like the religion itself. We are still supposedly a free country. It's only not okay to physically attack that guy with the beard, or forbid someone from worshipping Allah, or otherwise trample their Constitutional rights. That doesn't mean we need crecents in 9/11 memorials, the ACLU be damned. The exremists have infiltrated us already, and they are doing the dirty work of Osama and his kind.

DO NOT LET THEM FOOL YOU!!!

Prediction

Today, the would-be liquid explosive bombers... 8 men who would have together killed more than died on 9/11, go on trial in England. I predict that this trial and story will be largely ignored by the media. When briefly covered, they will be portrayed, most likely, as lonely aimless victims who fell through the cracks of a society oppressed by us, evil Americans.

To read all about it, visit the following link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=555465&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

I bet most people in America already completely forgot about this attack that almost was, were it not for the Patriot act and whatever intelligence agencies stopped it. Did you?

Conservative Like A Fox

I find it really, really annoying that the media still refers to Bush as a conservative. They can call him a Republican, that's one thing. But a conservative? What a joke.

I really have had enough this time- do you know what he's trying to do now? King George is trying to nationalize the banks. He wants to give Federal control over banks across America, so to be able to "bail out" (meaning rob blind) any company that does a Bear-Sterns and starts to go under. All this time I've been saying how Chavez in Venezuela is nationalizing everything, and here comes King George doing the same thing.

This is such an outrage that, again, the media largely ignores because they like such things, it really is unbelievable. This is pure liberalism. Pure socialism. Pure totalitarianism. If King George is allowed to do this- which hopefully he won't be, since he's a lame duck- we will have taken a huge step forward to a socialist, tyrannical government.

Now I really am wondering- not that 9/11 was an inside job, but was it just the right opportunity to expand the government powers to spy on its citizens? I don't know anymore. Could the crazy conspiracy guys be half right? King George just might be that good of an opportunist- he's sure trying to take advantage of this economic opportunity to expand the Fed into the banks. Maybe he used the Osama opportunity to expand the intelligence agencies (in size more than power... for now.)

It makes me wonder about all sorts of things. Perhaps this wiley King has played dumb for almost eight years now, while pushing his agenda the entire time. And no one saw it happening. Think about it. He has broken the borders, he has severely weakened the economic system and national security in doing so, he has weakened and put the country into huge debt with the unwon winnable war, he has put us in weakened positions concerning all our enemies he will no longer even pretend to stand up to (North Korea, China, Iran, and Russia come to mind), and now he is trying to steal the banks from us.

He denies the plan to create super highways that connect Mexico, America, and Canada... but Mexican government officials have already admitted such plans exist through NAFTA. He denies any desires or plan to create some sort of North American Union- like the failing European Union- but who on Earth would trust King George when he says anything, let alone something like that?

You may say, oh, it's just dumb ol' Bush trying to fix something. You may even say it's a good idea if you don't know better. Me, I see through the myst. Some of it at least- I still can't figure out who is pulling our King's strings. But I know one thing for sure, Bush has moved us closer to losing our sovereignty than any other President I am aware of. This expansion of the Fed into the entire banking system is all the proof I need.

Pelosi's Treason

If you have yet to do so, please read the post "Treason Ignored," and the follow-ups.

Pelosi is at it again. Proof positive that the communist wing of the Democrat party think they are a government unto themselves, or at least they are practicing the "act as if" strategy until they achieve their goal of a hostile takeover. What am I talking about?

Well, after laying low for a while, as the Democrat "primary" election (although democracy has little to do with either party's choosing of a candidate), stays heated, Pelosi, Speaker of the House and third in line for President, has gone to visit the Dalai Lama. Bush has taken a somewhat hard line on China before for its treatment of Tibet, but things are sticky right now since, for some reason, China gets to host the olympics this year. Bush is a lot of things, but he isn't Carter, so he's not going to do anything as stupid as boycott the olympics and completely screw the one chance at hundreds of athletes' life long dream. (Although some EU countries are considering it- have they no sense at all?)

The point here is that Pelosi has no business doing this. She is not the Secretary of State. Despite her delusional state, she is not President. Two people have to die or resign for that to happen. She is Speaker of the House. That's it. Her position has nothing to do with foreign relations whatsoever. Don't tell her that though. She's the anti-President or something, I'm not sure what goes on in her surely drug clouded mind. All I know is that every time she makes the news, it hurts our country. Sometimes in small ways, sometimes in big ways, and sometimes in such a traitorous way, she ought to be tried and executed. Instead she is heralded, most of the public goes on not even knowing this, let alone understanding the significance. Do you see my problem with our society's lack of interest in its own political system? And our media outlets, for that matter?

Still though, I have to wonder. Are her drug induced delusions of grandeur really so great? Is she just that wiley in trying to hood-wink the country into her party taking over for good? Is she just an idiot?

Really, what I want to know is: does she have no shame at all?

Cowardly Commercials draft

What is the deal with commercials today? Has anyone else noticed? You know, the constant portrayal of men as wimpy, pudgy, soft, dorky, nerdy, less-than-womanly types? Every commercial I see for anything technology-related, even for a car, has some short blading nasally sounding soft-mid-sectioned wimpy guy being a dork. Think of he Taco Bell commercials where four dorks sit around, maybe even a dorky woman with them, who always ends up winning the non-argument, debating what single adjective describes their unhealthy fast food lunch. If I recall, they settled on "crun-chew-eesy." Or the one with three super skinny long haired college losers (on pot, most likely), discovering the meaning to the word "unhunger." You know, because they're all too stupid to remember to call it "full." And, of course, let us not forget the slew of commercials featuring the wimpy pathetic guys in an anonymous setting of tiny cubicles, mimicing NBC's "The Office" with every portrayal of today's American.

But that's just it. This is how we portray ourselves now. This is how advertisers appeal to their target demographic of white males, age 25 to 49, or something close to that. They relate to what they see as the typical American by portraying him as a wimpy little dork. A guy who couldn't stand up straight if he tried. A guy who couldn't do 10 pushups or even situps. A guy who is more interested in his i-phone than his disproportionately attractive wife. (You will find that in entertainment, with very few exceptions, the female's first requirement is still to be good looking.) Have you seen the commercial where the idiot middle aged guy sprays his hose into his car's windshield, in pure awe that it automatically wipes the water off. Woooow. His wife comes out and rolls her eyes at him. You will notice that in these commercials, the women are always the voice of reason and common sense, and the men are bumbling idiotic fools. This is how the media complex sees us. Best case scenerio, it's a younger, single white guy dressed like a preppy-hippie, with a mismatching pleather sportcoat, blue jeans, long girly hair and a fruity colored tie attached to his untucked ugly striped shirt.

I have news for you, this is far from the REAL American. You don't believe me? Go to a cage fight, somewhere, and just look at the audience. That's the American white male for you. The real one.

However, I have something more to rant about than the above misportrayal of the common Ameican, let alone the ideal image of one. My problem is the recent surge in house alarm commercials. If you watch TV at all, you have surely seen them. One shows a single woman- in a house for a family of about six or seven, figure that out- getting ready for a "first date." It is then that a man wearing a ski mask- who is ALWAYS white in these commercials, I think we all know why- breaks a glass door to get in. At this point the siren goes off, the criminal runs away, the phone rings and some plastic-smile wearing guy is on the line with ADT security. He's contacting police for her immediately. You know, just in case the criminal hadn't already ran, the police could get there just in time to find the woman raped and/or murdered. Average response time for the police is what now? Less time than it takes to run someone down in a bathrobe and slash her throat, I'm sure.

This is not that I'm saying not to get a home alarm system. But consider the other commercial, again with a wimpy looking man and a disproportionately attractive woman as his wife. They hear something sleeping at night, he stumbles out of bed, looks down the stairs only to see that same masked white male breaking into the house. Again the glass is broken, the criminal runs, and the shaken man shrieks "oh my god" and runs into the room. The phone rings... etc. Wow, impressive portrayal of manhood from the great minds in marketing, eh?

Let me tell you the commercial I'd like to see. It's the same setting: a house in suburbia with a not-so-pudgy looking guy and his wife sleeping. Maybe the kids are sleeping in the other room. Instead of hearing something thud, the husband and wife are awoken by their dog growling. He barks once or twice, and the man reaches for his 12 gauge pump action shotgun. Sure, he's scared, but he moves out of the room with it anyway. The masked man- who can still be white, fine- is outside the window. The criminal hears the shik-chk of the shotgun loading a round, and he takes off just in time to not be killed by the giant blast of buckshot flying past the spot in which he was just standing. The wife is calling the police already. The only words that need to be spoken by the narrator are "Mossberg: made in America... to protect America."

Or maybe, with the single woman, she hears something- better yet her dog alerts her again- and she reaches for her Beretta 9mm pistol and cocks one into the chamber. The same masked white guy is breaking the glass door, her dog barks like crazy, and she opens fire on the guy. Maybe she even hits him once in the shoulder and the guy runs off, holding his wound with his other hand. The police arrive on the scene soon enough, and say it's a good thing she shot the guy, because they found two blocks down the road trying to kill someone else with a knife. They think he's the serial rapist who has been on the loose lately. They could show a US soldier, a policeman, then her, all carrying their Beretta FS series pistols, and the slogan could be: "Beretta FS series- good enough for a soldier... a cop... and even a citizen."

Contrast that with three college wimps eating fast food making up words like "unhunger." Which country would you rather live in? I dream of a society that values strength and courage, and despises the utter waste of energy put into eating crappy fast food and making lame jokes that only could be funny when extremely high on pot. Which, come to think of it, probably caused the dorks to get Taco Bell to begin with. It's called the munchies. Anyway, I don't know, maybe it's a lost cause. Maybe Americans are, yet again, relying solely on someone else for their own personal security now. That's the communist thing to do, isn't it? Even if the police aren't always enough, the anti-gun commies can finally admit that now. But the solution isn't a dog and a gun, it's an alarm company? Come on! Again, I have no problem with house alarms, but get a gun, learn to use it, and get a dog too. Kill that intruder before the police have a chance to show up too late, will you? Maybe once people start doing that the criminals will be more afraid to break into your house.

99 Problems But A Name Ain't One

If you got girl problems, I feel bad for you son. I got 99 problems but a girl ain't one.

In the year 2003, rapper Jay-Z (a.k.a. Sean Carter) released a song called 99 Problems. In the explicit version of the chorus, he said, "if you got girl problems I feel bad for you son. I got 99 problems but a b---- ain't one." No, I'm not going to talk about the complete lack of black feminist outrage, or even white feminists protesting his lyrics. I'm also not going to criticize rap music for its message and so forth. So why bring this up?

Well, I remember watching the video for the first time on MTV. I remember that whoever the MTV news guy, not Kurt Loder, the other one- I would call MTV news an oxymoron, but then I'd also have to call CNN, Fox, NBC... well, you get the idea- anyway, he was talking about the video before they showed it. He introduced it explaining that it was very controversial. Oh, so controversial! Causing a lot of talk, apparently. Because, you see, Carter, I mean Z, was shot in the end of the video. Not because of his derogatory references to women or black women, or blacks at large, because all of MTV's rap songs are like that. Close to all rap songs period are like that, actually. No, this one was controversial because... he got shot. Because, you know, that never happens on TV or in movies or anything.

I figured it was a lot of hype, so I watch the video- which wasn't very good, same goes for the song- and boy was it a disappointment. Yea, sure, in the end he is in front of some fence, the film is black and white, by the way, and he gets shot. There isn't even any blood. There is nothing. It's just Mr. Z looking like a bad actor with his hands out in the air, similar to the manner six year old boys pretend to get shot in the play box. Wow, what controversy!

Truth is, you probably guessed, there was no controversy. Not one bit. Even MTV stopped trying to pretend that there was after less than a week. The entire thing was an attempt, an incredibly poor one at that, to create some sort of extra buzz around the video. I hope Z's record company didn't pay too much for it. Truth is, even that incorrigible racist Rush Limbaugh, so far as I know, had nothing to say about this oh-so-controversial video. He probably never even knew of its existence. What I'm getting at is: while MTV swung and missed with this one, we might still understand how the media, whatever source it may be, tries to twist things. Tries to make a big deal out of nothing. Tries to fabricate issues and opinions, then brainwash you into buying into them. You can bet that a bunch of kids watching it went around parroting the supposed controversial nature of the video to one another. Luckily for the sake of rational thought, no one pays much to what a fifteen year old kid thinks about a music video.

Fast forward about five years, go to a McCain rally, and what do we have here? Why, there's some so-called right-winger calling Barry by his middle name. Egad! Gasp! Shock! Barack Hussein Obama! Why, that right-winger used his middle name! And so, the media comes out talking about just how terrible and controversial it is. And here is the difference the perceptive person will notice. MTV, a relatively small time entertainment source, attempted to stir up hype by simply saying something was controversial. They introduced the video, "warning" the audience of the violence-which wasn't there, and told the audience that it was controversial. It didn't work. The seasoned spinners, liars, and communists at CNN, well, they were much more smooth, which is why they were able to succeed. What they did, what they always do, is act as if it were controversial. They don't have to immediately call it controversial, they just show up- Niel Cavuto, you scum, I'm talking about you- asking people like Juan McCain if they thinking it's okay. To them, or so they pretend, it already is contraversial, so calling it that is just redundant. They trick poor, naive America at large via the old salesman's adage: "act as if."

Boy, it worked, too. Even on our so-called leadership. Of course, our so-called leadership has the wit of a goldfish. McCain, the Republican nominee barring the near impossible, when questioned by that Cavuto piece of trash, whether or not it was okay to use Hussein's middle name, said absolutely not. It should never be done, he said. What a tool! If it were me, I would have smiled and said gee, I'm not sure, what is his middle name? Cavuto the moron would sooner or later have to fill me in, and I'd say well if you can use it, so can I, and anyone else. And if he absolutely refused, saying that I'm just playing games or whatever, I'd point out that he's the one playing games, using Rodham whenever he wants for Hillary, but not Hussein for Barry. Either way, saying that Hussein is somehow off limits is a losing argument to anyone with half a brain, and I have a whole brain. Apparently, after being in the "beltway" for so long, every one of our leaders has less than half a brain now.

So let us move on to answer the issue at hand. Can we use his middle name? Well, I don' want to get in to the free speech issue that guarantees our right to say Hussein, Hussein, Hussein as many times as we want. Liberals don't really believe in free speech anyway. They believe in their opinion's free speech. No, let us move on from that, and wonder if we should, rather than if we can.

Let's examine Obama. His Kenyan father that named him and his mother Stanley (named after her father, who wanted a boy so bad he named his daughter after himself) left before Obama could have even known him. Stanley soon remarried another Muslim man, who took them to Indonesia for some time. Fast forward to today, Barry is supposedly a Christian, with an extra large cross on his bible for the cameras to see. Of course, his church is a radical black-only church that preaches not Christian values so much as black values. Angry anti-white, anti-America black values. One must also note Barry's obscure reference to the Sermon on the Mount that he says condones same-sex unions (another misnomer for marriage). He also says that choices about abortion- even partial birth abortion- should involve a woman's family, councilor, pastor... instead of a "bureaucrat in Washington." (This is the only time Barry will ever mention the bureaucracy of Washington as a negative- mark my words.) So let me get this straight. He says that abortion is okay, so long as the woman talks with her pastor about it? Because her pastor will condone it? I don't know how Christian Mr. Hussein Obama really is...

But that is not all. This Muslim connection that everyone is trying to cover up- poorly, not that it matters- is an issue! Our enemy fights us in the name if Islam. There are plenty of good Muslims, in this country and outside of it, but our enemy is what it is. So it is an issue that must be discussed to any sane person. Why can't Hussein Obama come out and say that, yes, he went to a Madrasa but it was a moderate, non-hate-preaching school in Indonesia? And for that matter, why doesn't he distance himself from that radical preacher of his?

Wait! Why should this be discussed? That's not fair, Obama's father's religion should never be discussed, that's taboo. It is only fair right? Yea, sure. It isn't like the media ever scrutinized the hell out of Mitt Romney for his religion. Never mind that Romney's values are more Christian than Obama's could ever hope to be. In fact, Mitt's that was born and is based in this country. No, no, the media was completely fair about Mitt's belief system. Just because Mitt explained why his religion would not override his presidency doesn't mean anything. We need to scrutinize him! But Hussein Obama is different. You can't just ask him any question you want, the rules change for him. He's black people...

Well, here I come, the racist in all my glory, because I'm asking some questions anyway. If we had a fair media, Obama would already have been asked most or all of these questions. They involve Islam and his middle name. And his heritage and connections and so on. They don't really involve his mixed racial background, yes, he is half white, because I don't care. I want them answered by the Obama camp. They won't be.

Ahem. Mr. Barack Hussein Obama...


Why does a "man" like Farrakhan endorse you?

Are you two friends? Have you ever met with him?

Why did your church of twenty years bestow Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award?

Why do other Islamic leaders support you, for that matter?

Did he give your campaign any money?

Did anyone from CAIR or any other Muslim organization give your campaign any money?

Why does your church preach such black vs. white oriented sentiments?

What is your middle name, again?

What does it mean?

Do you like it?

Can you explain how the Sermon on the Mount overrides all the specific words against homosexual acts in the bible?

What about the 2000 years of doctrine against it?

Does Christianity really condone abortion, especially partial birth abortion?

Does Islam?

Do you personally consider it an evil act?

Do you consider a fetus a human life?

What did you learn in the Indonesian Madrasa you attended?

Was there any hate speech against Jews, or any other non-believers?

Was it there that you learned to not salute the American flag or wear the cheesy lapel pin?

What kind of measures would you take against Islamic extremists, to protect America?

Does your Muslim background have anything to do with your desire to retreat and surrender in Iraq?

Who does donate all this money to you anyway?

Was it a Christian or a Muslim that introduced you to cocaine in your drug abusing years?

And finally, why do you and your wife act afraid of people using your middle name?

I have plenty more problem with Obama's policies, stances, philosophies, behaviors, etc. Pretty much everything except his color- hey, turns out I'm not racist! I also have a lot more questions for him than those above. The fact is, Obama has a whole lot of explaining to do, only a fraction of which involves his middle name. The man is a naked communist with naked communist policies. He is anti-everything-American. His endorsers, even his wife, utter seemingly nothing but anti-American sentiments. My hope is that, as he dodges his own name, a relatively small issue, and makes everyone bringing it up sound racist; all these other, admittedly more important issues- like his being a communist- sneak up on him. Maybe he will be exposed for the Soviet sympathizing, freedom hating, double talking snake that he really is.

If I may stoop to the level of the Obama-maniac fan for just a moment, just this once, so that they may understand what I'm trying to say, let me conclude with this...

If your middle name's Hussein, I feel bad for you son. You've got 99 problems but your name ain't one.