Some people do get it. Despite all the brainwashing. The gun shop owner who sold a Glock Seung-Hui Cho, the insane kid who shot up the Virginia Tech school, is making ammends in his own way. No, he isn't closing down his shop. He isn't joining the Brady campaign. He isn't doing anything stupid to worsen the situation. He is offering to sell a firearm to any Virginia Tech student at a large discount. So large a discount, in fact, that he loses money on the transaction. To him, it is worth it, because the students, usually on a very fixed budget, would be otherwise incapable of acquiring a weapon with which to defend themselves (on campus). After all, this lunatic Cho was bent on a massacre, it is a safe bet that he would have perpetrated it whether it was easy to get a gun or not. However, if, say, just a quarter of the students there were packing, and had any idea at all how to use a gun, he would not have killed so many people. Maybe none at all.
Still, a spokes-moron named Larry Hincker, the Associate VP for University Relations, had this to say:
"[the offer is] incredibly insensitive to the families of the victims who lost loved ones, and to the injured students still recovering from this horrendous tragedy..."
Clearly, some people are just beyond help.
Friday, April 25, 2008
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Coming Together?
You know what I am absolutely SICK of hearing? People telling me that we all need to "come together" to solve something as stupid as, say, "climate change." Are you kidding me? I suppose it is not about the fact that global warming is a giant hoax that makes me embarrassed of the lack of simple knowledge among my fellow citizens, at least it will get us all to come together? Well that's something, isn't it? Our country is so divided, we need to all come together for something...
Well you know what? The Italian peninsula was not united since the fall of Rome in the 400s until the early 1900s under Benito Mussolini. Mussolini's fascist government really brought people together! Like they hadn't been in a thousand and a half years. Finally, the Italian people were brought together! United! They were one nation again!
Ask anyone still alive from that era if it was worth it.
Well you know what? The Italian peninsula was not united since the fall of Rome in the 400s until the early 1900s under Benito Mussolini. Mussolini's fascist government really brought people together! Like they hadn't been in a thousand and a half years. Finally, the Italian people were brought together! United! They were one nation again!
Ask anyone still alive from that era if it was worth it.
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
How Liberals Make Things Worse 2- Earth Day Edition
It is no big secret that liberals are madly in love with the concept of anthropogenic global warming. (That means “caused by man.”) So sure are they that mankind will destroy the Earth’s environment so much that not only we, but most all of life as the globe knows it, will die off. Hurricanes! Rising sea levels! Ice bergs! Tornados! Malaria! Drought! Starvation! War! The list goes on.
To help avoid this series of catastrophes that will surely result in Ragnarok, the liberals endorse ideas like ethanol and hybrid cars! These, you see, will result in less carbon dioxide being put into the atmosphere. If only carbon dioxide had anything to do with the mild, miiiild global warming we are (possibly were) experiencing… but that is a different subject. The point is: ethanol and hybrid cars will help us “pollute” less. Right?
WRONG!!! As it turns out, the pollution created from producing the corn (or whatever else you decide to use, maybe sugar cane) that is used to create ethanol greatly exceeds the amount of pollution you would use from good ol’ gasoline, or “gasolina,” as the liberals would have us pronounce it. This is all not to mention the sharp rise in food prices this causes that helps further starve the third world. So much for cutting carbon emissions.
But wait, it gets better. A study was done- a legitimate one- and it has been determined that hybrids pollute more than even a Hummer H3. You read that right- get this. The industrial production involved with a hybrid’s rechargeable batter is so high in pollution, that to produce a Hybrid and drive it for an average vehicle lifespan would put more of that evil carbon dioxide into the air than to produce and drive a Hummer. Seriously. This is not a joke. Now, don’t get me wrong, a little more CO2 overall is fine with me- plants breathe that stuff. It’s good for them. It helps them grow. But the average liberal (meaning the useful idiots that the Democrats/communists use to further their agenda) is trying ever so desperately to get less CO2 in the air, and here they are, yet again, screwing it up, by putting more in it instead. Shocking.
So there you have it. Once again, the liberals have set out with a goal and moved in the opposite direction. I don’t believe one wink in man made global warming, but I don’t like (concentrated) pollution any more than anyone else. I hate smog. Liberals hate it not so much for good reasons, but stupid ones. In their effort to fix it, they make it worse. Lucky for them, liberals give each other credit for trying, not succeeding. Failing with good intentions is better than doing anything right in their book. Is it any wonder hippies never have jobs? Anyway, I think we all see where this is going… Regarding pollution and CO2 output, “saving the world,” this is just one more example of How Liberals Make Things Worse.
To help avoid this series of catastrophes that will surely result in Ragnarok, the liberals endorse ideas like ethanol and hybrid cars! These, you see, will result in less carbon dioxide being put into the atmosphere. If only carbon dioxide had anything to do with the mild, miiiild global warming we are (possibly were) experiencing… but that is a different subject. The point is: ethanol and hybrid cars will help us “pollute” less. Right?
WRONG!!! As it turns out, the pollution created from producing the corn (or whatever else you decide to use, maybe sugar cane) that is used to create ethanol greatly exceeds the amount of pollution you would use from good ol’ gasoline, or “gasolina,” as the liberals would have us pronounce it. This is all not to mention the sharp rise in food prices this causes that helps further starve the third world. So much for cutting carbon emissions.
But wait, it gets better. A study was done- a legitimate one- and it has been determined that hybrids pollute more than even a Hummer H3. You read that right- get this. The industrial production involved with a hybrid’s rechargeable batter is so high in pollution, that to produce a Hybrid and drive it for an average vehicle lifespan would put more of that evil carbon dioxide into the air than to produce and drive a Hummer. Seriously. This is not a joke. Now, don’t get me wrong, a little more CO2 overall is fine with me- plants breathe that stuff. It’s good for them. It helps them grow. But the average liberal (meaning the useful idiots that the Democrats/communists use to further their agenda) is trying ever so desperately to get less CO2 in the air, and here they are, yet again, screwing it up, by putting more in it instead. Shocking.
So there you have it. Once again, the liberals have set out with a goal and moved in the opposite direction. I don’t believe one wink in man made global warming, but I don’t like (concentrated) pollution any more than anyone else. I hate smog. Liberals hate it not so much for good reasons, but stupid ones. In their effort to fix it, they make it worse. Lucky for them, liberals give each other credit for trying, not succeeding. Failing with good intentions is better than doing anything right in their book. Is it any wonder hippies never have jobs? Anyway, I think we all see where this is going… Regarding pollution and CO2 output, “saving the world,” this is just one more example of How Liberals Make Things Worse.
How Liberals Make Thing Worse
There is a series called “Gangland” on the History Channel that airs every Thursday night. I wish every American would watch this show, especially the episode covering MS-13. Perhaps then the sleeping dragon would wake up long enough to eject these vermin trash from our country. Anyway, the episode last night was about a gang known as the Texas Syndicate. Though they originated in California, their numbers and power grew in Texas- and in the prison system of that state is where they really became what they were.
The story of their rise to “greatness” contains a lesson clearly lost on everyone on the left side of the aisle. Most self-identified “Republican” politicians too. During the 70s, the Texas penal system was not easy on inmates. The inmates were forced to work on chain gangs- that’s where there are five or so prisoners chained together so none can run off, and they dig ditches or something. Guards stand nearby with shotguns, just incase someone tries something stupid. In the prison facility, the hardened prisoners, most of whom were convicted of crimes such as rape or murder- and those who weren’t still had probably committed such crimes- knew that if they stepped out of line, they would get a beat-down from the guards. Yes, a beat-down. The animals known as inmates were kept in line like animals; they were treated with respect IF they showed it first. The vast majority of the time, their lesson didn’t have to be learned the hard way. When they did, it usually took only once.
Then, in the very early 80s, a perverted concept of civil rights showed up. This is when the Texas Syndicate found it possible to grow in numbers and power. I can only assume that the ACLU was behind all this- it’s a good bet- and all of a sudden, chain gangs were not allowed. Cruel and unusual, apparently, was it to force murderers to labor while the tax payers fund their room and board. Of course, you can forget about physical punishment of inmates who needed it. Give them cable TV, HBO- yard time with a full set of weights with which to work out- to fill that void. The ever so liberal idea was that these new policies would make the prison system more humane to the inmates.
Well, before I get to the ironic (and moronic) part, let me first tell you that this new, lax environment is what allowed the prisoners to truly act out their animal instincts. They got in the now outnumbered guards’ faces, threatened to rape and kill them and their families, and often attempted- and undoubtedly occasionally succeeded- in attacking the guards. I know the liberals have no care for prison guards, or “the man,” as they probably regard them, but I still think this occurrence is important to understand. It was this chaotic, violent environment that enabled the Texas Syndicate to take form.
Now, the real irony is that the humaneness of the prisoners’ lives fell dramatically. It plummeted. Because the guards could no longer punish a prisoner for acting out occasionally, they all acted out. Mostly on each other. Lines were drawn on racial and ethnic backgrounds, gangs formed, and inmate-on-inmate violence soared. Beatings, stabbings, gang rapes, all were commonplace now. These new, “humane” policies not only resulted in the formation of terrible, subhuman gangs… they resulted in the worse imaginable environment for the inmates as well.
I hope you’re thinking what I’m thinking: how retarded.
Here’s the trick. Now that these prisoners have all these “rights” (“inmate rights” is a concept almost laughable, if you ask me) to carry out their animal-like behavior, no one will take them away. No one will even try to go back to the good days of chain gangs, in which guards were free to whip the inmates into line. When the prisoners had to earn their keep, and actually pay their debt to society through work rather than sitting around. The ACLU would surely defend these animals’ rights still, despite the slew of supposedly unintended consequences that make life worse for everyone. And I mean everyone. The inmates, the guards, and the citizens outside. The sheer insanity of it all is enough to make you dizzy.
This, my readers, is what liberals do. They come in with ideas, theories, stuff that sounds good- to some people- on paper… and it fails in practice. God forbid we stick to something that we evolved over hundreds if not thousands of years and has shown to work wherever tried. A prison system that treats prisoners like prisoners!? No, no… let’s try it the way that has always failed. You know, the way that didn’t work last time, or the time before, and, going back to ancient times, still didn’t work. It’s the humane thing to do, after all. If you ask me, sometimes a little ruthlessness is the most humane policy. Sun Tzu would agree with me. When you think about it, it really is no wonder that liberals STILL think communism can work.
Let us face the facts. Violent offenders are despicable scum, their actions have shown that. It is an insult to the rest of us to even call them human. Actually, considering how animals treat each other, it is an insult to call them animals, too. No cruel and unusual punishment? Fine, that is a good policy. We will not torture our citizens (the constitution only applies to American citizens and foreigners in our borders legally, by the way), we will not be overly cruel, no mutilating and such… and this is a good thing. The founding fathers knew this. They did not want the government to abuse its power. I have no objections with that.
However, the founders would also have approved of the Texas penal system in the 70s, and I guarantee you they would scold everyone for letting it turn to what we have today. They taught us that the government exists to protect the people- and that is what the old Texas system did, and it was within the bounds of the Constitution. These animals need to be locked away and kept in line- and prevented from forming dangerous organizations that flood our country with violence, intimidation, and drugs. The only logical solution is to run our maximum security prisons like Texas did in the 70s, nation wide. They worked. And, maybe execute some of the worst offenders, but that is a different debate.
Logic be damned, the ACLU will have us treating these prisoners better than outsiders until Americans get organized enough to stand up to liberals like ACLU lawyers and take their power away. Some day, I hope, the ACLU will be seen as the anti-American organization that it is and be disbanded due to lack of funding and interest. Maybe they can even be sued, or even prosecuted for aiding and abetting the enemy- like Islamist terrorists. Don’t think that they haven’t.
It all starts at the water cooler. Letters to the editor. Around the dinner table. Even in the college classroom, impossible as that seems today. And, of course, in posts like this that I hope enough people will read and pass on. Not for fame, just to get the message out. It is long past time to take our country back. I want everyone to know this story and its lesson. Because this is just one of countless examples of: How Liberals Make Things Worse.
The story of their rise to “greatness” contains a lesson clearly lost on everyone on the left side of the aisle. Most self-identified “Republican” politicians too. During the 70s, the Texas penal system was not easy on inmates. The inmates were forced to work on chain gangs- that’s where there are five or so prisoners chained together so none can run off, and they dig ditches or something. Guards stand nearby with shotguns, just incase someone tries something stupid. In the prison facility, the hardened prisoners, most of whom were convicted of crimes such as rape or murder- and those who weren’t still had probably committed such crimes- knew that if they stepped out of line, they would get a beat-down from the guards. Yes, a beat-down. The animals known as inmates were kept in line like animals; they were treated with respect IF they showed it first. The vast majority of the time, their lesson didn’t have to be learned the hard way. When they did, it usually took only once.
Then, in the very early 80s, a perverted concept of civil rights showed up. This is when the Texas Syndicate found it possible to grow in numbers and power. I can only assume that the ACLU was behind all this- it’s a good bet- and all of a sudden, chain gangs were not allowed. Cruel and unusual, apparently, was it to force murderers to labor while the tax payers fund their room and board. Of course, you can forget about physical punishment of inmates who needed it. Give them cable TV, HBO- yard time with a full set of weights with which to work out- to fill that void. The ever so liberal idea was that these new policies would make the prison system more humane to the inmates.
Well, before I get to the ironic (and moronic) part, let me first tell you that this new, lax environment is what allowed the prisoners to truly act out their animal instincts. They got in the now outnumbered guards’ faces, threatened to rape and kill them and their families, and often attempted- and undoubtedly occasionally succeeded- in attacking the guards. I know the liberals have no care for prison guards, or “the man,” as they probably regard them, but I still think this occurrence is important to understand. It was this chaotic, violent environment that enabled the Texas Syndicate to take form.
Now, the real irony is that the humaneness of the prisoners’ lives fell dramatically. It plummeted. Because the guards could no longer punish a prisoner for acting out occasionally, they all acted out. Mostly on each other. Lines were drawn on racial and ethnic backgrounds, gangs formed, and inmate-on-inmate violence soared. Beatings, stabbings, gang rapes, all were commonplace now. These new, “humane” policies not only resulted in the formation of terrible, subhuman gangs… they resulted in the worse imaginable environment for the inmates as well.
I hope you’re thinking what I’m thinking: how retarded.
Here’s the trick. Now that these prisoners have all these “rights” (“inmate rights” is a concept almost laughable, if you ask me) to carry out their animal-like behavior, no one will take them away. No one will even try to go back to the good days of chain gangs, in which guards were free to whip the inmates into line. When the prisoners had to earn their keep, and actually pay their debt to society through work rather than sitting around. The ACLU would surely defend these animals’ rights still, despite the slew of supposedly unintended consequences that make life worse for everyone. And I mean everyone. The inmates, the guards, and the citizens outside. The sheer insanity of it all is enough to make you dizzy.
This, my readers, is what liberals do. They come in with ideas, theories, stuff that sounds good- to some people- on paper… and it fails in practice. God forbid we stick to something that we evolved over hundreds if not thousands of years and has shown to work wherever tried. A prison system that treats prisoners like prisoners!? No, no… let’s try it the way that has always failed. You know, the way that didn’t work last time, or the time before, and, going back to ancient times, still didn’t work. It’s the humane thing to do, after all. If you ask me, sometimes a little ruthlessness is the most humane policy. Sun Tzu would agree with me. When you think about it, it really is no wonder that liberals STILL think communism can work.
Let us face the facts. Violent offenders are despicable scum, their actions have shown that. It is an insult to the rest of us to even call them human. Actually, considering how animals treat each other, it is an insult to call them animals, too. No cruel and unusual punishment? Fine, that is a good policy. We will not torture our citizens (the constitution only applies to American citizens and foreigners in our borders legally, by the way), we will not be overly cruel, no mutilating and such… and this is a good thing. The founding fathers knew this. They did not want the government to abuse its power. I have no objections with that.
However, the founders would also have approved of the Texas penal system in the 70s, and I guarantee you they would scold everyone for letting it turn to what we have today. They taught us that the government exists to protect the people- and that is what the old Texas system did, and it was within the bounds of the Constitution. These animals need to be locked away and kept in line- and prevented from forming dangerous organizations that flood our country with violence, intimidation, and drugs. The only logical solution is to run our maximum security prisons like Texas did in the 70s, nation wide. They worked. And, maybe execute some of the worst offenders, but that is a different debate.
Logic be damned, the ACLU will have us treating these prisoners better than outsiders until Americans get organized enough to stand up to liberals like ACLU lawyers and take their power away. Some day, I hope, the ACLU will be seen as the anti-American organization that it is and be disbanded due to lack of funding and interest. Maybe they can even be sued, or even prosecuted for aiding and abetting the enemy- like Islamist terrorists. Don’t think that they haven’t.
It all starts at the water cooler. Letters to the editor. Around the dinner table. Even in the college classroom, impossible as that seems today. And, of course, in posts like this that I hope enough people will read and pass on. Not for fame, just to get the message out. It is long past time to take our country back. I want everyone to know this story and its lesson. Because this is just one of countless examples of: How Liberals Make Things Worse.
Monday, April 21, 2008
Waco's Sequel
Well, at least no one was killed this time.
You know what? I don't have a lot of time to write this, so it'll be quick. We are now living in a time, it has been confirmed with this "polygamist" (allegedly) sect, that the federal government can take your children away whenever they want. All a place in Texas needs is a fake phone call from Colorado. No due process. No reason worth a warrant. One prank phone call from my neighbor, and, apparently, the FASCISTS at CPS (child "protective" services) can take my kids away from me via a small, armed, police/military-like operation. We have no freedom anymore. They have it, they just don't flex their muscle all that much... yet.
I wrote "protective" in quotes, by the way, because I assure you- I promise- that those kids who get taken away will be worse off for it. You know, I thought we lived in a country where you raised your kids according to your own values (only restrictions like not making them criminals used to apply). Now, apparently, if you don't like a very religious group of people, you can move in and remove them, and put them in a foster home. How many of these kids who were removed- and I bet you they won't be given back to their parents- are going to end up in porno, or on drugs, or what have you? That's not in accordance with anyone's values except the liberal fascists in CPS, those short haired, fat, lesbian types. The whole thing disgusts me more than I can describe.
And you know what? The press is just part of the same government-media complex that has taken our freedom. From Fox News to CNN, everyone hangs these people out as guilty before a shred of evidence has shown up.
One prank phone call.
And your kids are taken from you by force.
You know what msnbc.com has to say about the whole story, AFTER it came out that the phone call was fake? After it was confirmed that the government has taken children on the basis of nothing from their parents? After we have all the evidence we need to know that the government has, de facto, our freedom in its pocket. The headline read "why do the polygamists dress like that?" Because they wear old style clothes. Yea, because that's the important thing here.
You know what? I don't have a lot of time to write this, so it'll be quick. We are now living in a time, it has been confirmed with this "polygamist" (allegedly) sect, that the federal government can take your children away whenever they want. All a place in Texas needs is a fake phone call from Colorado. No due process. No reason worth a warrant. One prank phone call from my neighbor, and, apparently, the FASCISTS at CPS (child "protective" services) can take my kids away from me via a small, armed, police/military-like operation. We have no freedom anymore. They have it, they just don't flex their muscle all that much... yet.
I wrote "protective" in quotes, by the way, because I assure you- I promise- that those kids who get taken away will be worse off for it. You know, I thought we lived in a country where you raised your kids according to your own values (only restrictions like not making them criminals used to apply). Now, apparently, if you don't like a very religious group of people, you can move in and remove them, and put them in a foster home. How many of these kids who were removed- and I bet you they won't be given back to their parents- are going to end up in porno, or on drugs, or what have you? That's not in accordance with anyone's values except the liberal fascists in CPS, those short haired, fat, lesbian types. The whole thing disgusts me more than I can describe.
And you know what? The press is just part of the same government-media complex that has taken our freedom. From Fox News to CNN, everyone hangs these people out as guilty before a shred of evidence has shown up.
One prank phone call.
And your kids are taken from you by force.
You know what msnbc.com has to say about the whole story, AFTER it came out that the phone call was fake? After it was confirmed that the government has taken children on the basis of nothing from their parents? After we have all the evidence we need to know that the government has, de facto, our freedom in its pocket. The headline read "why do the polygamists dress like that?" Because they wear old style clothes. Yea, because that's the important thing here.
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Did You Know? (Infiltration)
This post is for anyone who still denies that Islamist groups are trying to infiltrate our culture and help wage jihad on America via means other than violence. (Violence is still their ultimate goal, of course. They merely mean to soften us up.)
Okay, so maybe you have a learning disability, and you do not understand what the organization CAIR is. You don't get it when you hear that they denied or doubted Osama's involvement in 9/11 even after he took credit for it. You don't get it when they sue or attack anyone and everyone they possibly can under false accusations, including but not limited to Paul Harvey (of all people!?) and Michael Savage, who is currently suing them for slander and copyright abuse, I believe- and has a really good case. You don't even get it that they help fund terrorism and were unindicted co-conspirators in a Federal terrorism trial.
Maybe you also don't understand the significance of the "Flying Imams," and what they were trying to do. Maybe you don't get it that they were acting way too Islamic on a plane, fully intent on getting themselves kicked off, just so they could sue later and soften up security as well as good citizens who don't like it when people chant "Allah, Allah, Allah" then ask for seat belt extensions when they don't need them.
But this- this should really help you understand. A memorial has been in the works in the PA field that flight 93 went down. The passengers tried to take the plane back, and the hijackers crashed it before they could. Another attack on either the Capitol Building, or the White House, probably, was averted. Now the memorial suddenly contains numerous Islamic symbols, including its very shape: a giant crecent.
A petition is circling to fix this insult.
Do you see now, how they fight this war? It isn't just in Iraq. It isn't just terrorist attacks. It is by any and every means at their disposal. It is just as much a PR war, to soften up our attitudes towards extremist Islam, as it is anything else.
You know what? Don't let the PC police get you. It's okay to feel anger at some guy in a turban with a giant bushy unkempt beard. It's okay to get mad when your child's high school has "Islam Day" where they have to learn all about Muslims, but without the violence that pervades almost every part of the world you find that religion. It's okay to not like the religion itself. We are still supposedly a free country. It's only not okay to physically attack that guy with the beard, or forbid someone from worshipping Allah, or otherwise trample their Constitutional rights. That doesn't mean we need crecents in 9/11 memorials, the ACLU be damned. The exremists have infiltrated us already, and they are doing the dirty work of Osama and his kind.
DO NOT LET THEM FOOL YOU!!!
Okay, so maybe you have a learning disability, and you do not understand what the organization CAIR is. You don't get it when you hear that they denied or doubted Osama's involvement in 9/11 even after he took credit for it. You don't get it when they sue or attack anyone and everyone they possibly can under false accusations, including but not limited to Paul Harvey (of all people!?) and Michael Savage, who is currently suing them for slander and copyright abuse, I believe- and has a really good case. You don't even get it that they help fund terrorism and were unindicted co-conspirators in a Federal terrorism trial.
Maybe you also don't understand the significance of the "Flying Imams," and what they were trying to do. Maybe you don't get it that they were acting way too Islamic on a plane, fully intent on getting themselves kicked off, just so they could sue later and soften up security as well as good citizens who don't like it when people chant "Allah, Allah, Allah" then ask for seat belt extensions when they don't need them.
But this- this should really help you understand. A memorial has been in the works in the PA field that flight 93 went down. The passengers tried to take the plane back, and the hijackers crashed it before they could. Another attack on either the Capitol Building, or the White House, probably, was averted. Now the memorial suddenly contains numerous Islamic symbols, including its very shape: a giant crecent.
A petition is circling to fix this insult.
Do you see now, how they fight this war? It isn't just in Iraq. It isn't just terrorist attacks. It is by any and every means at their disposal. It is just as much a PR war, to soften up our attitudes towards extremist Islam, as it is anything else.
You know what? Don't let the PC police get you. It's okay to feel anger at some guy in a turban with a giant bushy unkempt beard. It's okay to get mad when your child's high school has "Islam Day" where they have to learn all about Muslims, but without the violence that pervades almost every part of the world you find that religion. It's okay to not like the religion itself. We are still supposedly a free country. It's only not okay to physically attack that guy with the beard, or forbid someone from worshipping Allah, or otherwise trample their Constitutional rights. That doesn't mean we need crecents in 9/11 memorials, the ACLU be damned. The exremists have infiltrated us already, and they are doing the dirty work of Osama and his kind.
DO NOT LET THEM FOOL YOU!!!
Friday, April 4, 2008
Prediction
Today, the would-be liquid explosive bombers... 8 men who would have together killed more than died on 9/11, go on trial in England. I predict that this trial and story will be largely ignored by the media. When briefly covered, they will be portrayed, most likely, as lonely aimless victims who fell through the cracks of a society oppressed by us, evil Americans.
To read all about it, visit the following link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=555465&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
I bet most people in America already completely forgot about this attack that almost was, were it not for the Patriot act and whatever intelligence agencies stopped it. Did you?
To read all about it, visit the following link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=555465&in_page_id=1770&ct=5
I bet most people in America already completely forgot about this attack that almost was, were it not for the Patriot act and whatever intelligence agencies stopped it. Did you?
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Conservative Like A Fox
I find it really, really annoying that the media still refers to Bush as a conservative. They can call him a Republican, that's one thing. But a conservative? What a joke.
I really have had enough this time- do you know what he's trying to do now? King George is trying to nationalize the banks. He wants to give Federal control over banks across America, so to be able to "bail out" (meaning rob blind) any company that does a Bear-Sterns and starts to go under. All this time I've been saying how Chavez in Venezuela is nationalizing everything, and here comes King George doing the same thing.
This is such an outrage that, again, the media largely ignores because they like such things, it really is unbelievable. This is pure liberalism. Pure socialism. Pure totalitarianism. If King George is allowed to do this- which hopefully he won't be, since he's a lame duck- we will have taken a huge step forward to a socialist, tyrannical government.
Now I really am wondering- not that 9/11 was an inside job, but was it just the right opportunity to expand the government powers to spy on its citizens? I don't know anymore. Could the crazy conspiracy guys be half right? King George just might be that good of an opportunist- he's sure trying to take advantage of this economic opportunity to expand the Fed into the banks. Maybe he used the Osama opportunity to expand the intelligence agencies (in size more than power... for now.)
It makes me wonder about all sorts of things. Perhaps this wiley King has played dumb for almost eight years now, while pushing his agenda the entire time. And no one saw it happening. Think about it. He has broken the borders, he has severely weakened the economic system and national security in doing so, he has weakened and put the country into huge debt with the unwon winnable war, he has put us in weakened positions concerning all our enemies he will no longer even pretend to stand up to (North Korea, China, Iran, and Russia come to mind), and now he is trying to steal the banks from us.
He denies the plan to create super highways that connect Mexico, America, and Canada... but Mexican government officials have already admitted such plans exist through NAFTA. He denies any desires or plan to create some sort of North American Union- like the failing European Union- but who on Earth would trust King George when he says anything, let alone something like that?
You may say, oh, it's just dumb ol' Bush trying to fix something. You may even say it's a good idea if you don't know better. Me, I see through the myst. Some of it at least- I still can't figure out who is pulling our King's strings. But I know one thing for sure, Bush has moved us closer to losing our sovereignty than any other President I am aware of. This expansion of the Fed into the entire banking system is all the proof I need.
I really have had enough this time- do you know what he's trying to do now? King George is trying to nationalize the banks. He wants to give Federal control over banks across America, so to be able to "bail out" (meaning rob blind) any company that does a Bear-Sterns and starts to go under. All this time I've been saying how Chavez in Venezuela is nationalizing everything, and here comes King George doing the same thing.
This is such an outrage that, again, the media largely ignores because they like such things, it really is unbelievable. This is pure liberalism. Pure socialism. Pure totalitarianism. If King George is allowed to do this- which hopefully he won't be, since he's a lame duck- we will have taken a huge step forward to a socialist, tyrannical government.
Now I really am wondering- not that 9/11 was an inside job, but was it just the right opportunity to expand the government powers to spy on its citizens? I don't know anymore. Could the crazy conspiracy guys be half right? King George just might be that good of an opportunist- he's sure trying to take advantage of this economic opportunity to expand the Fed into the banks. Maybe he used the Osama opportunity to expand the intelligence agencies (in size more than power... for now.)
It makes me wonder about all sorts of things. Perhaps this wiley King has played dumb for almost eight years now, while pushing his agenda the entire time. And no one saw it happening. Think about it. He has broken the borders, he has severely weakened the economic system and national security in doing so, he has weakened and put the country into huge debt with the unwon winnable war, he has put us in weakened positions concerning all our enemies he will no longer even pretend to stand up to (North Korea, China, Iran, and Russia come to mind), and now he is trying to steal the banks from us.
He denies the plan to create super highways that connect Mexico, America, and Canada... but Mexican government officials have already admitted such plans exist through NAFTA. He denies any desires or plan to create some sort of North American Union- like the failing European Union- but who on Earth would trust King George when he says anything, let alone something like that?
You may say, oh, it's just dumb ol' Bush trying to fix something. You may even say it's a good idea if you don't know better. Me, I see through the myst. Some of it at least- I still can't figure out who is pulling our King's strings. But I know one thing for sure, Bush has moved us closer to losing our sovereignty than any other President I am aware of. This expansion of the Fed into the entire banking system is all the proof I need.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
